This Article is From Apr 22, 2024

Law Tribunal Orders Insolvency Proceedings Against Media Baron Subhash Chandra

The NCLT bench, consisting of members Ashok K Bhardwaj and Subrata K Das, however, rejected similar pleas filed by two other creditors IDBI Trusteeship and Axis Bank.

Advertisement
Business News

The order was pronounced by the NCLT in the open court (File)

New Delhi:

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Monday ordered insolvency proceedings against media baron Subhash Chandra on a plea filed by Indiabulls Housing Finance.

A two-member Delhi bench of the NCLT directed initiation of personal insolvency proceedings against Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (ZEEL) Chairman Emeritus Mr Chandra, who was a guarantor for a loan given to Essel group firm Vivek Infracon Ltd.

The NCLT bench, consisting of members Ashok K Bhardwaj and Subrata K Das, however, rejected similar pleas filed by two other creditors IDBI Trusteeship and Axis Bank.

The order was pronounced by the NCLT in the open court and a detailed judgement is still awaited.

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd (IHFL) had moved NCLT after Vivek Infracon had in 2022 defaulted a payment of around Rs 170 crore. Vivek Infracon is a part of Essel Group promoted by Mr Chandra.

Advertisement

Though some settlement talks had taken place, no payment was made to IHFL.

The matter which was admitted in NCLT on Monday was the case of personal insolvency against Mr Chandra under Section 95 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Advertisement

After initiation of the insolvency proceedings, Mr Chandra would come under the moratorium provisions of the IBC and would not be allowed to sell, dispose or alienate any property or assets.

A Resolution Professional would be appointed by the insolvency tribunal, who would collate all the loans and help the financial creditors recover their money.

Advertisement

Earlier, Mr Chandra had contended that a personal guarantor cannot be liable for insolvency proceedings and the NCLT has no powers to initiate the process against him.

However, this was rejected by the NCLT in May 2022 and the tribunal held that it has the jurisdiction and authority to adjudicate personal insolvency proceedings.

Advertisement

Subsequently, this was challenged by Mr Chandra before the appellate tribunal NCLAT. However, the matter was withdrawn as parties decided to settle the matter amicably.

However, the issue was revived again by IHFL earlier this year as the settlement with Mr Chandra did not materialise.

Advertisement

In 2019, the government amended the provisions of IBC, allowing the creditors to file insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors.

This provision was challenged in the Supreme Court and the top court in November 2023 upheld the validity of these provisions.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Featured Video Of The Day

Maharashtra Votes For High-Stakes Polls, Phase-2 In Jharkhand

Advertisement