New Delhi: The Delhi High Court today sought response from Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on a plea by a Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader seeking a direction to strike off the fresh allegations levelled by him in the civil defamation suit against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and five others.
Justice Vipin Sanghi issued notice to Mr Jaitley for April 19 on a plea alleging that the Union Minister has "exploited the opportunity of filing replication (a plaintiff's reply to the defendant's plea) for the purpose of introducing fresh allegations of defamation to make out a fresh case".
The plea by AAP leader Ashutosh was opposed by Mr Jaitley, saying whatever said in his reply was very much part of the main plaint filed before the Joint Registrar.
Senior advocates Sandeep Sethi, Rajiv Nayar and Pratibha Maninder Singh, who appeared for Mr Jaitley, submitted that the replication by the minister was merely an elaboration of the plaint, which is part of the documents.
Mr Sethi further submitted that there was only one quotation which has not been mentioned in the main plaint.
Senior advocate HS Phoolka, counsel for Ashutosh, wished to examine the tabulation given by the minister's counsel showing that they have already said so in their suit.
The court made it clear that the proceedings before the Joint Registrar, who is hearing the suit, will not postpone the matter in pursuance to pendency of this application.
The application was filed in a suit in which Mr Jaitley has sought Rs 10 crore in damages from Mr Kejriwal, Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) when he was its President.
The minister has already denied all the allegations.
(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Justice Vipin Sanghi issued notice to Mr Jaitley for April 19 on a plea alleging that the Union Minister has "exploited the opportunity of filing replication (a plaintiff's reply to the defendant's plea) for the purpose of introducing fresh allegations of defamation to make out a fresh case".
The plea by AAP leader Ashutosh was opposed by Mr Jaitley, saying whatever said in his reply was very much part of the main plaint filed before the Joint Registrar.
Mr Sethi further submitted that there was only one quotation which has not been mentioned in the main plaint.
Advertisement
The court made it clear that the proceedings before the Joint Registrar, who is hearing the suit, will not postpone the matter in pursuance to pendency of this application.
Advertisement
The minister has already denied all the allegations.
Advertisement
(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Ground 3 Engines, Handover Them To Lessors In 15 Days: Delhi High Court To Spicejet Women Can Also Be Tried For 'Penetrative Sexual Assault' On Child: High Court Former Trainee IAS Puja Khedkar Gets Protection From Arrest Till August 21 2 French Rafale Jets Collide Mid-Air, Instructor, Pilot Missing Ayatollah Khamenei Warns Of "Divine Wrath" If Iran Backs Down Against Israel 150 mg Semen In Kolkata Doctor's Body, Suspect Gang-Rape: Parents To Court In PM Modi's Independence Day Speech, A Call For "24x7 For 2047" Oropouche Virus Kills 2 In Brazil: All About The Rare Disease Punjab Toll Plaza Blunder: Man Charged Rs 220 While Relaxing At Home Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.