Anita Advani had sought monthly maintenance and a three-bedroom flat in Bandra.
Mumbai:
In a relief to late actor Rajesh Khanna's wife Dimple Kapadia, daughter Twinkle Khanna and son-in-law Akshay Kumar, the Bombay High Court quashed a complaint of domestic violence lodged against them by his alleged live-in partner Anita Advani.
Justice M L Tahaliyani allowed petitions filed by Dimple, Twinkle and Akshay seeking quashing of proceedings initiated against them by a lower court based on a complaint lodged by Anita.
Quashing the proceedings, Justice Tahaliyani observed that her relation with Mr Khanna was not of the nature of marriage and hence, she cannot seek relief under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act.
The court further held that all family members of Mr Khanna cannot be roped into the proceedings as she had never lived with them.
Soon after the high court passed the order, Anita's lawyers sought a stay on it, but it was refused. She had filed a complaint in 2013 before a magistrate under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act against Dimple, daughters Twinkle and Rinkie and Akshay.
Anita had claimed that she was evicted from Mr Khanna's suburban bungalow 'Aashirwad' after his death and had sought monthly maintenance and a three-bedroom flat in Bandra.
The magistrate had then issued notices to them for their reply, following which they approached the HC seeking quashing of the proceedings against them.
The high court had earlier this year discharged Rinkie from the case after observing that she was married and lived in Kolkata and hence, offence under the Domestic Violence Act cannot be made out against her.
Senior counsels Shirish Gupte and Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for the family, argued that Anita cannot claim relief under the DV Act and maintenance as Dimple and her family was not living with Mr Khanna or her.
In her petition, Dimple had contended that she was the legally-wedded wife of Khanna and as such no other woman could claim share in the wealth left behind by her husband.
Dimple's counsel Mr Gupte had argued that a woman in a live-in relationship with a married man cannot claim relief under the DV Act. He argued that Mr Khanna and her relation can be at the most described as "adulterous".
Akshay's counsel Mr Jethmalani argued that she cannot come to court on sympathy. "Her case at the most can be of wrongful dispossession but not under domestic violence. Assuming that she is right, she can file a civil suit and challenge the will," he said.
Mr Khanna, the first Hindi film actor to gain super stardom in Indian films, died on July 18, 2012, after a brief illness.
Justice M L Tahaliyani allowed petitions filed by Dimple, Twinkle and Akshay seeking quashing of proceedings initiated against them by a lower court based on a complaint lodged by Anita.
Quashing the proceedings, Justice Tahaliyani observed that her relation with Mr Khanna was not of the nature of marriage and hence, she cannot seek relief under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act.
The court further held that all family members of Mr Khanna cannot be roped into the proceedings as she had never lived with them.
Soon after the high court passed the order, Anita's lawyers sought a stay on it, but it was refused. She had filed a complaint in 2013 before a magistrate under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act against Dimple, daughters Twinkle and Rinkie and Akshay.
Anita had claimed that she was evicted from Mr Khanna's suburban bungalow 'Aashirwad' after his death and had sought monthly maintenance and a three-bedroom flat in Bandra.
The magistrate had then issued notices to them for their reply, following which they approached the HC seeking quashing of the proceedings against them.
The high court had earlier this year discharged Rinkie from the case after observing that she was married and lived in Kolkata and hence, offence under the Domestic Violence Act cannot be made out against her.
Senior counsels Shirish Gupte and Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for the family, argued that Anita cannot claim relief under the DV Act and maintenance as Dimple and her family was not living with Mr Khanna or her.
In her petition, Dimple had contended that she was the legally-wedded wife of Khanna and as such no other woman could claim share in the wealth left behind by her husband.
Dimple's counsel Mr Gupte had argued that a woman in a live-in relationship with a married man cannot claim relief under the DV Act. He argued that Mr Khanna and her relation can be at the most described as "adulterous".
Akshay's counsel Mr Jethmalani argued that she cannot come to court on sympathy. "Her case at the most can be of wrongful dispossession but not under domestic violence. Assuming that she is right, she can file a civil suit and challenge the will," he said.
Mr Khanna, the first Hindi film actor to gain super stardom in Indian films, died on July 18, 2012, after a brief illness.
