Salman Khan photographed outside a studio in Mumbai.
Mumbai:
Bollywood actor Salman Khan's lawyer on November 16 sought examination of singer Kamaal Khan as a witness by the prosecution in the 2002 hit-and-run case. Mr Khan has been sentenced to five-year jail term in the case.
Justice A R Joshi asked the prosecution to file by tomorrow a reply rejecting or accepting the appeal filed by Mr Khan's lawyer Amit Desai in the High Court.
"Why had the prosecution not examined this witness in the trial court? Kamaal Khan is the best eyewitness available to the prosecution as he was present in Salman's car on September 28, 2002, when it rammed into a shop in Bandra killing one person and injuring four others," said Mr Desai in the appeal.
Kamaal Khan can throw light on who was driving the car, the lawyer added. Mr Khan's lawyer has been saying that it was his driver Ashok Singh who was behind the wheel. (Also Read - Grave Injustice by Not Examining Kamaal Khan: Salman Khan's Lawyer in Hit-And-Run)
Ravindra Patil, an eyewitness in the case, died during the trial in 2007. The prosecution relied on his statement before the magistrate implicated Mr Khan, but as the defence couldn't cross-examine him, it caused prejudice to the actor, advocate Desai said.
The prosecution also didn't examine Ashok Singh, though he had gone to the police station (after the accident) to give his statement, he said.
The trial judge had rejected his testimony (as a defence witness), observing that he might be trying to save his employer by taking the blame on himself.
Mr Desai contended that the prosecution told the trial court that Kamaal was abroad and not available for testifying, but it made no efforts to bring the singer to the court and it should explain this.
The trial court on May 6 held Mr Khan guilty of 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder', upholding the police's case that he was drunk and was driving the car when the accident took place in suburban Bandra.
Justice A R Joshi asked the prosecution to file by tomorrow a reply rejecting or accepting the appeal filed by Mr Khan's lawyer Amit Desai in the High Court.
"Why had the prosecution not examined this witness in the trial court? Kamaal Khan is the best eyewitness available to the prosecution as he was present in Salman's car on September 28, 2002, when it rammed into a shop in Bandra killing one person and injuring four others," said Mr Desai in the appeal.
Kamaal Khan can throw light on who was driving the car, the lawyer added. Mr Khan's lawyer has been saying that it was his driver Ashok Singh who was behind the wheel. (Also Read - Grave Injustice by Not Examining Kamaal Khan: Salman Khan's Lawyer in Hit-And-Run)
Ravindra Patil, an eyewitness in the case, died during the trial in 2007. The prosecution relied on his statement before the magistrate implicated Mr Khan, but as the defence couldn't cross-examine him, it caused prejudice to the actor, advocate Desai said.
The prosecution also didn't examine Ashok Singh, though he had gone to the police station (after the accident) to give his statement, he said.
The trial judge had rejected his testimony (as a defence witness), observing that he might be trying to save his employer by taking the blame on himself.
Mr Desai contended that the prosecution told the trial court that Kamaal was abroad and not available for testifying, but it made no efforts to bring the singer to the court and it should explain this.
The trial court on May 6 held Mr Khan guilty of 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder', upholding the police's case that he was drunk and was driving the car when the accident took place in suburban Bandra.
