Ahmedabad: Zakiya Jafri's case against Chief Minister Narendra Modi has always been regarded as one with the potential to drastically alter the leader's political future. Mrs Jafri has accused the Chief Minister and others of preventing assistance to the hundreds of people that were attacked during the communal riots in 2002. In these, the worst riots in independent India, 1200 people were killed, most of them Muslims. Here are 10 big facts about the new developments.
1.Huge relief for Narendra Modi - a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has reportedly said there's no evidence to provoke his prosecution in a case that accuses him and other senior politicians of restraining the police from helping those being attacked during the 2002 riots. The SIT report was handed last night to a court in Gujarat. The fact that it clears Mr Modi has been welcomed by the BJP, with leaders like Arun Jaitley suggesting that the case against him should now be closed. The Chief Minister tweeted a quote from Swami Vivekananda today, "The history of the world is the history of a few men who had faith in themselves."
2. The report is meant to be confidential, but the fact that its contents have been leaked has upset the Congress. "If what the BJP is claiming of the SIT report is true, it not only raises a question mark on the BJP but also the SIT. What's the point of submitting a confidential report?" asked Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.
3. The case was filed in 2008 in the Supreme Court by Mrs Jafri, whose husband and former Congress MP Ehsaan Jafri was set on fire during the 2002 riots near his home in Ahmedabad's Gulbarg Society. Nearly 69 people were killed here in 24 hours. Mr Jafri was trying to protect his neighbours from a mob of people. The riots in Gujarat began when one coach of a train filled with karsevaks returning from Ayodhya was set on fire near the Godhra railway station on February 27, 2002, killing 59 people.
4. Mrs Jafri first took her case to the Gujarat High Court in 2007. Her petition said that Mr Modi and nearly 60 other politicians and police officers conspired to ignore calls from help, and decided not to interrupt the rioting mobs. She says her husband made several calls to the Chief Minister's Office and others, but was denied assistance. The High Court refused to accept her case, so she then appealed to the Supreme Court, which set up the SIT in 2009.
5. The investigating team is headed by RK Raghavan, who retired as the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation. The team questioned Mr Modi twice on March 25, 2010.
7. The SIT told the Supreme Court last year that it had not found evidence against Mr Modi. The court also asked senior advocate Raju Ramachandran to serve as an amicus curiae and interview key witnesses. Mr Ramachandran's report was allegedly different from the SIT's on several key points. So the Supreme Court sent both reports to the trial court in Gujarat and asked it to decide on whether Mr Modi should be tried.
8. The SIT has also not found evidence to support the claim of senior police officer Sanjiv Bhatt, who was suspended last year. Mr Bhatt had alleged that on February 27, 2002, the Chief Minister called a meeting of senior police officers where he said that it was imperative for Hindus to be allowed to "vent out their anger." The other policemen who attended that meeting say Mr Bhatt was not present. He was suspended in August last year for skipping work and using an official car when he was not on duty.
10. Ahead of the elections, Mr Modi has been holding fasts in different parts of the state - part of what he calls his sadbhavana mission to promote communal harmony. Mr Modi has been trying to establish his secular credentials because the taint of the riots in his home state has kept him from entering the national political landscape.
1.Huge relief for Narendra Modi - a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has reportedly said there's no evidence to provoke his prosecution in a case that accuses him and other senior politicians of restraining the police from helping those being attacked during the 2002 riots. The SIT report was handed last night to a court in Gujarat. The fact that it clears Mr Modi has been welcomed by the BJP, with leaders like Arun Jaitley suggesting that the case against him should now be closed. The Chief Minister tweeted a quote from Swami Vivekananda today, "The history of the world is the history of a few men who had faith in themselves."
2. The report is meant to be confidential, but the fact that its contents have been leaked has upset the Congress. "If what the BJP is claiming of the SIT report is true, it not only raises a question mark on the BJP but also the SIT. What's the point of submitting a confidential report?" asked Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi.
3. The case was filed in 2008 in the Supreme Court by Mrs Jafri, whose husband and former Congress MP Ehsaan Jafri was set on fire during the 2002 riots near his home in Ahmedabad's Gulbarg Society. Nearly 69 people were killed here in 24 hours. Mr Jafri was trying to protect his neighbours from a mob of people. The riots in Gujarat began when one coach of a train filled with karsevaks returning from Ayodhya was set on fire near the Godhra railway station on February 27, 2002, killing 59 people.
4. Mrs Jafri first took her case to the Gujarat High Court in 2007. Her petition said that Mr Modi and nearly 60 other politicians and police officers conspired to ignore calls from help, and decided not to interrupt the rioting mobs. She says her husband made several calls to the Chief Minister's Office and others, but was denied assistance. The High Court refused to accept her case, so she then appealed to the Supreme Court, which set up the SIT in 2009.
5. The investigating team is headed by RK Raghavan, who retired as the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation. The team questioned Mr Modi twice on March 25, 2010.
7. The SIT told the Supreme Court last year that it had not found evidence against Mr Modi. The court also asked senior advocate Raju Ramachandran to serve as an amicus curiae and interview key witnesses. Mr Ramachandran's report was allegedly different from the SIT's on several key points. So the Supreme Court sent both reports to the trial court in Gujarat and asked it to decide on whether Mr Modi should be tried.
8. The SIT has also not found evidence to support the claim of senior police officer Sanjiv Bhatt, who was suspended last year. Mr Bhatt had alleged that on February 27, 2002, the Chief Minister called a meeting of senior police officers where he said that it was imperative for Hindus to be allowed to "vent out their anger." The other policemen who attended that meeting say Mr Bhatt was not present. He was suspended in August last year for skipping work and using an official car when he was not on duty.
Advertisement
10. Ahead of the elections, Mr Modi has been holding fasts in different parts of the state - part of what he calls his sadbhavana mission to promote communal harmony. Mr Modi has been trying to establish his secular credentials because the taint of the riots in his home state has kept him from entering the national political landscape.
COMMENTS
Advertisement
At 100 Million, PM Modi Is Most-Followed World Leader On X Today "Web Of Lies": M Kharge Counters PM's '8 Crore Jobs In 4 Years' Remark PM Modi Attends Anant Ambani-Radhika Merchant's 'Shubh Aashirwad' Ceremony In Massive Row Over Karnataka 100% Quota Bill, Chief Minister Deletes Post "I Divorce You... Your Ex-Wife": Dubai Princess Dumps Husband In Insta Post Akhilesh Yadav's 'Game Of Thrones' Barb, BJP Minister KP Maurya's Counter Viral Sensation Leaves Internet Speechless With Youthful Looks At 58 Bengaluru Restaurant's "Dirt Cheap" Prices Have Stunned Internet. See Post How A Small-Town Kannadiga Brought India Its 1st Miss Universe Petite Crown Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.