This Article is From Feb 14, 2011

2G Scam: Tata Group responds to ADAG allegations

New Delhi: A day after Anil Ambani group firm Reliance Communication accused its competitors and corporate rivals in the telecom industry for putting up "a smokescreen and cover their own unprecedented irregularities over the past decade and thereby protect their industry market shares built through manipulation of the policy regime and favouritism in connivance with certain DoT officials of the relevant time", Tata group has issued the following statement:

In reference to the statement issued by Reliance Communications yesterday (13 February 2011), Tata Teleservices Limited would like to make certain clarifications on comments made about the Tata Group and TTSL.

We reproduce below an extract from the Reliance Communications' statement issued yesterday:

Quote...
"The grant of dual technology approval to RCOM, against its application that had been pending from February 2006 for more than 18 months, was on identical terms and payment of identical fees as for three other companies - Shri Ratan Tata group's Tata Teleservices, Himachal Futuristic Communications and Shyam Telecom (now known as Sistema) - and there is nothing special or untoward in the same."
...Unquote

TTSL's clarification:

Tata Teleservices was the only operator, amongst those named above, to apply for Dual-Technology License after the 19 October 2007 announcement by the Department of Telecommunications. It is hence unfair and incorrect to compare TTSL with the other applicants, who had applied before the policy was announced. This has also been validated in the CAG Report. It is indeed special and intriguing that Reliance Communications and two other operators applied and got DoT approval even before the policy was announced. It is even more intriguing that Reliance Communication was allotted spectrum in all the circles immediately, in January 2008, whereas TTSL got DoT approval after 83 days, and that TTSL, even after 3 years, is still awaiting spectrum allocation in the crucial Delhi Circle and in 39 commercially crucial districts in 9 telecom circles; and

Tata Teleservices Limited and Tata Group are not family-owned or family-run concerns, or owned by Mr Ratan Tata. Hence, to refer to them as 'Shri Ratan Tata group's Tata Teleservices Limited' is not appropriate.

.