This Article is From Sep 27, 2021

"Amazon - East India Company 2.0": RSS-Linked Magazine's Latest Target

Earlier in September, Panchjanya lashed out Infosys - an information technology behemoth widely seen as one of India's biggest success stories in the global business community

Advertisement
India News Reported by , Edited by (with inputs from Reuters)
New Delhi:

E-commerce giant Amazon has been called "East India Company 2.0" in the latest controversial cover story by Panchjanya - a journal with roots in the RSS, the ruling BJP's ideological mentor.

Panchjanya editor Hitesh Shankar on Monday tweeted an image of the new cover, which features Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and the headline "#Amazon: East India Company 2.0".

The cover refers to allegations Amazon's legal representatives bribed Indian officials, and asks: "What did it (the company) do wrong it needed to bribe... Why do people consider this company a threat to indigenous entrepreneurship, economic freedom and culture?"

Amazon has not yet responded to the tweet or the magazine's cover story.

The article has, however, been backed by the Confederation of All India Traders, or CAIT, which said it "greatly appreciated" the cover story and that it "corroborated" the group's claims that Amazon and Flipkart are "trying to become second edition of East India Company in India".

"... is a matter of fact that business model of these two companies are similar (to) that of East India Company - selling goods at cheaper rate irrespective of the quality... killing competition... and monopolising the market in their favour..." BC Bhartia, CAIT National President, said.

Advertisement

"This is exactly what East India Company did... both Amazon and Flipkart want to invade our country's econom(ic) and social culture..." the CAIT chief declared.

Last week the government said that bribery charges involving Amazon - specifically questions raised over the payment of an estimated Rs 8,500 crore in legal fees - would be fully investigated.

Advertisement

"... it is time to think where all it is going... whole system seems to work on bribes and that is not the best of business practices," unnamed Indian government officials were quoted as saying.

The US-headquartered company has also launched an internal inquiry into claims that surfaced after a whistleblower flagged alleged bribe payments.

Advertisement

The company's senior corporate counsel has reportedly been sent on leave.

It is unclear when and in which state the alleged acts of bribery took place.

Advertisement

Both sides have stressed "zero tolerance towards corruption".

Earlier in September, Panchjanya lashed out Infosys - an information technology behemoth widely seen as one of India's biggest success stories in the global business community.

Advertisement

The article attacked Infosys over the repeated glitches that have marked the rollout of the new income tax e-filing portal; the company was accused an "anti national conspiracy".

The attack - in a magazine considered close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government - also led an executive working at a global consultancy to tell news agency Reuters "everyone is scared".

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh called the article and its content "absolutely condemnable", and said that it was, in fact, the magazine that was "anti national" for attacking Infosys.

The Panchjanya article on Infosys came a month after Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal took a swipe at the $106 billion Tata Group's objections to proposed policy changes for e-commerce.

"The frontal attack on iconic elements of Indian businesses have only buttressed the need for companies to ensure they are conforming, not just with tax issues, but with other government initiatives," Dilip Cherian, co-founder of a leading PR firm, told Reuters.

The government moved to distance itself from the Panchjanya article criticising Infosys; Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman called it "not right".

The RSS also distanced itself from that article; spokesperson Sunil Ambekar said the magazine "is not a mouthpiece... and article or opinions in it should not be linked with the RSS."

With input from Reuters

Advertisement