Mumbai: Hearing a petition against a controversial meat ban in Mumbai , a court today questioned the Maharashtra government: "When you are talking of Ahimsa, how come fish, sea food and eggs are not banned?"
There is a difference between mutton and fish, the government replied.
"Fish die the moment they are out of water. So there is no slaughter involved," the government's top lawyer, Anil Singh, told the Bombay High Court.
The sentiment, he explained, was that there should be no slaughter involved.
Hours later, the government told the court that the ban had been cut short from four days to just one more day.
Mutton traders of Mumbai had challenged the ban that started yesterday for the Jain festival of fasting, Paryushan, amid protests by some parties, including the ruling BJP's ally Shiv Sena.
The BJP wanted the ban extended to eight days, but the Sena said it will ensure meat is openly sold and eaten in the financial capital on the days of the ban.
The decision to cut short the ban was taken by the Sena-dominated Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation.
In court earlier, the government had confronted questions about the logic of the ban, which was described as "regressive" by the judges.
"We have to change our attitude in view of globalisation," said the judges.
Strongly defending its move, the government argued: ""Globalisation can't be at the cost of our heritage, culture and sentiments of religion."
Like Opposition parties the Congress and the NCP, the Shiv Sena has alleged a political move by the BJP to appease the Jain community in Mumbai, with an eye on elections to the civic body in 2017.
The ban during the Jain fast was introduced in 1994 by the then Congress government. Ten years later, the two-day ban was extended to four days, but has never really been implemented, officials say.
There is a difference between mutton and fish, the government replied.
"Fish die the moment they are out of water. So there is no slaughter involved," the government's top lawyer, Anil Singh, told the Bombay High Court.
Hours later, the government told the court that the ban had been cut short from four days to just one more day.
Advertisement
The BJP wanted the ban extended to eight days, but the Sena said it will ensure meat is openly sold and eaten in the financial capital on the days of the ban.
Advertisement
In court earlier, the government had confronted questions about the logic of the ban, which was described as "regressive" by the judges.
Advertisement
Strongly defending its move, the government argued: ""Globalisation can't be at the cost of our heritage, culture and sentiments of religion."
Advertisement
The ban during the Jain fast was introduced in 1994 by the then Congress government. Ten years later, the two-day ban was extended to four days, but has never really been implemented, officials say.
COMMENTS
Advertisement
High Court Sets Aside Probe Agency Chargesheets Against Farooq Abdullah, Others Rajasthan Man Gives "Triple Talaq" Over Phone To Marry Pakistani Woman Rajnath Singh Chairs Key Security Meet Over Rising Terror Attacks In J&K "Took Advantage Of His Addiction": 5 Charged Over Matthew Perry's Death Nurse Raped, Killed On Way Home, Body Found 9 Days Later In UP This US City Has Been Declared America's Least Desirable, Survey Finds Ukraine, Russia Both Claim Advances In Kursk Region Gaza Ceasefire Talks Underway In Qatar As Deaths Top 40,000 Trump To Hold Press Conference, His Campaign Adds Senior Advisers Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.