The plea by Sameer Wankhede's father is to be heard by a division bench tomorrow. File
Dnyandev Wankhede, father of NCB's zonal director Sameer Wankhede, today approached the Bombay High Court challenging its single-judge bench order that had refused to restrain Maharashtra minister Nawab Malik from making comments and putting up social media posts against the anti-drug agency officer and his family.
Dnyandev Wankhede mentioned for urgent hearing his appeal challenging the single bench order and urged a division bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav to grant him relief. His appeal is likely to be heard by the division bench tomorrow.
On Monday, a single-judge bench of Justice Madhav Jamdar had refused to grant Mr Wankhede any interim relief in his defamation suit filed against Mr Malik.
Mr Wankhede had cited Mr Malik's tweets and public statements, whereby the latter had alleged, among other things, that Sameer Wankhede had been born a Muslim, but had falsely claimed that he belonged to a designated Scheduled Caste (SC) to secure a central government job.
He had sought as interim relief that Mr Malik be prohibited from making any defamatory statements or tweets, social media posts, etc, against him, Sameer Wankhede, or any of their family members.
Justice Jamdar, however, had held that imposing such a blanket prohibition upon Mr Malik was not possible in the present case.
The single bench had held that though it seemed apparent that Mr Malik's statements and tweets against the NCB officer had acted out of malice and animosity, the allegations the minister had made against Sameer Wankhede did not seem prima facie to be completely false.
The single bench, however, had directed Mr Malik to henceforth make public statements or comments against Mr Wankhede and his family only after reasonable verification of facts.
In his appeal mentioned before the division bench, Dnyandev Wankhede contended that since the single bench had held that Mr Malik's allegations against Sameer Wankhede had stemmed out of malice, the minister should have been restrained from making further defamatory comments against him and his family.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)