Three men sentenced to death for the rape, torture and killing of a 19-year-old woman in 2012 were freed by the Supreme Court yesterday. The prosecution "failed to prove their case" against the men, the Supreme Court said, giving them "the benefit of the doubt".
The three, Ravi Kumar, Rahul and Vinod, were held guilty and sentenced to death by the trial court in 2014. The Delhi High Court upheld the death sentence, likening the men to "predators" trawling the streets "hunting for prey".
But a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice UU Lalit said the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the three men "beyond reasonable doubt" and the court acted like a "passive umpire" while convicting them.
The identity of the accused was not established by the prosecution, the Supreme Court said, pointing to what it called "glaring lapses" in the trial.
Of 49 witnesses, 10 were not cross examined in the trial, the court pointed out.
"Courts should strictly decide cases on merits in accordance with law. Courts should not be influenced by any kind of outside moral pressures or otherwise," the Supreme Court said.
Justice Ravindra Bhat and Justice Bela M Trivedi were the two other judges on the bench.
The incident took place months before the gangrape and killing of a 23-year-old student by five men on a moving bus in Delhi, which triggered nationwide protests, worldwide outrage and sweeping changes to the laws on sexual crimes.
In February 2012, the young woman's mutilated and burnt body was found in a field in Haryana's Rewari district, days after she was kidnapped. Severe wounds suggested that she was hit with car tools and earthen pots.
It was revealed during investigations that acid was poured in the woman's eyes and a bottle of liquor was inserted in her private parts.
The three challenged the Delhi High Court ruling in Supreme Court, asking that their sentence be reduced.
In the Supreme Court, the Delhi Police had opposed reducing the death sentence. They had said the crime was committed not only against the victim, but also against society.
The convicts' defense had cited their age, family background and past criminal record to argue that their sentence should be reduced.
Following the Supreme Court verdict, the parents of the girl said they were "broken" by the judgment but asserted that they would continue their legal fight. "We came here for justice. This is a blind justice system."
Top Court Takes Strong Exemption To Termination Of Women Civil Judges In Madhya Pradesh Supreme Court Asks Poll Body To Explain Rationale Behind Increasing Voter Limit Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against "Socialist", "Secular" In Constitution's Preamble Devendra Fadnavis' Name Surprise on Maharashtra Oath Ceremony Invite It's Official: D Fadnavis Will Be Maharashtra Chief Minister, Oath Tomorrow Assassination Attempt On Sukhbir Badal During His Penance At Golden Temple French Government Risks Falling In No-Confidence Vote Massive Traffic Jam At Delhi Border As Rahul Gandhi Stopped On Way To UP How Vietnamese Business Tycoon Masterminded World's Biggest Bank Fraud Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.