NEW DELHI: A lawmaker of Bihar's ruling alliance who wanted action against a magazine for an article published 23 years ago has been fined 10 lakh by the Supreme Court.
"You are a representative of the people. You can't be expected to misuse the jurisdiction of this court," Chief Justice of India JS Kehar observed, calling the legislator's petition filed after such a long gap as "frivolous".
Ravindra Singh, who is a member of Lalu Yadav's RJD, had approached the top court to seek an inquiry into the article published in a magazine, Niyachakra in 1994. The article, he said, made derogatory remarks against some castes.
Singh replied that he read it in 2013 and first went to the Patna High Court, which dismissed his plea in December.
"The cause raised by the petitioner is unjustified and we fail to understand what prompted the petitioner to file a petition for an article written in 1994," Chief Justice Kehar said.
The court wasn't inclined to change its mind. Chief Justice Kehar explained why.
When a student was fined Rs 25 for violating the rules, he protested. Not because he wanted the fine to be waived. Instead, the student argued that he was from a rich family and wanted the fine to be raised. The entire courtroom burst out laughing.
Incidentally, the RJD legislator had declared movable assets of about 5.46 lakh - more than half of it in cash - in his election affidavit filed in 2015. He had also declared land valued at 85 lakh.
"You are a representative of the people. You can't be expected to misuse the jurisdiction of this court," Chief Justice of India JS Kehar observed, calling the legislator's petition filed after such a long gap as "frivolous".
Ravindra Singh, who is a member of Lalu Yadav's RJD, had approached the top court to seek an inquiry into the article published in a magazine, Niyachakra in 1994. The article, he said, made derogatory remarks against some castes.
Singh replied that he read it in 2013 and first went to the Patna High Court, which dismissed his plea in December.
Advertisement
"The cause raised by the petitioner is unjustified and we fail to understand what prompted the petitioner to file a petition for an article written in 1994," Chief Justice Kehar said.
Advertisement
The court wasn't inclined to change its mind. Chief Justice Kehar explained why.
Advertisement
When a student was fined Rs 25 for violating the rules, he protested. Not because he wanted the fine to be waived. Instead, the student argued that he was from a rich family and wanted the fine to be raised. The entire courtroom burst out laughing.
Advertisement
Incidentally, the RJD legislator had declared movable assets of about 5.46 lakh - more than half of it in cash - in his election affidavit filed in 2015. He had also declared land valued at 85 lakh.
COMMENTS
Advertisement
India Must Shield Constitutional Bodies From Political Influence: Supreme Court Judge Patrik Schick Nets Four As Bayer Leverkusen Thrash Freiburg 5-1, Close Gap To Bayern Munich Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Review Of Bail Order To Senthil Balaji "Intention To Dupe UPSC": Ex-IAS Trainee Puja Khedkar Denied Pre-Arrest Bail "Congress Should Be Ready...": Mani Shankar Aiyar's Big INDIA Bloc Remark 3 Marriages, Rs 1.25 Crore: How 'Looting Bride' Targeted Rich Men More Than Half Of Kolkata's Iconic Yellow Taxis To Be Off Roads In 2025 Data Exclusivity Anti Poor, Anti-Farmer, Anti Self-Reliance: Ashwani Mahajan Year Ender 2024: What Donald Trump's Return To White House Means For World Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.