Bilkis Bano was allegedly gangraped in the aftermath of the 2002 Godhra riots.
Mumbai:
The Bombay High Court on Thursday rejected an application filed by the lawyer of the convicts in the 2002 Bilkis Bano gang-rape case seeking re-examination of some of the witnesses.
A division bench of justices VK Tahilramani and Mridula Bhatkar said it cannot entertain such an application at a stage when trial is over and appeals are being heard.
Defence lawyer Harshad Ponda had sought the permission to re-examine prosecution witnesses KN Sinha, who led the CBI team which probed the case; Bilkis Bano's nephew Saddam, who was eight-years-old at the time of the incident; and Budhsingh Patel, a 'writer constable' at Limkheda police station who wrote down the first FIR lodged by Bilkis Bano.
Mr Ponda also wanted to call a new witness, Mangal Singh, another 'writer constable' at Limkheda police station.
He wanted to re-examine the witnesses because the defence lawyers had made some mistakes during the trial and overlooked certain significant facts when cross-examining, he said. CBI lawyer Hiten Venegaonkar opposed the application, saying it had come at a "belated stage".
Law does not allow calling of new witness or re- examination of a witness at a stage when the defence has concluded its arguments in the appeal, Mr Venegaonkar said.
The Bombay High Court is hearing appeals filed by 11 convicts in the case, as well as the appeal filed by CBI seeking death penalty for three of them.
The accused were sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court here in 2008 for the gangrape of Bilkis and murder of her family members during a post-Godhra riot.
On March 3, 2002, a mob attacked Bilkis Bano' house at Randhikpur near Ahmedabad and killed seven members of the family. Bilkis Bano, who was five months pregnant, was allegedly gangraped.
The trial was transferred out of Gujarat for the fear that witnesses might be intimidated or influenced.
A division bench of justices VK Tahilramani and Mridula Bhatkar said it cannot entertain such an application at a stage when trial is over and appeals are being heard.
Defence lawyer Harshad Ponda had sought the permission to re-examine prosecution witnesses KN Sinha, who led the CBI team which probed the case; Bilkis Bano's nephew Saddam, who was eight-years-old at the time of the incident; and Budhsingh Patel, a 'writer constable' at Limkheda police station who wrote down the first FIR lodged by Bilkis Bano.
Mr Ponda also wanted to call a new witness, Mangal Singh, another 'writer constable' at Limkheda police station.
He wanted to re-examine the witnesses because the defence lawyers had made some mistakes during the trial and overlooked certain significant facts when cross-examining, he said. CBI lawyer Hiten Venegaonkar opposed the application, saying it had come at a "belated stage".
Law does not allow calling of new witness or re- examination of a witness at a stage when the defence has concluded its arguments in the appeal, Mr Venegaonkar said.
The Bombay High Court is hearing appeals filed by 11 convicts in the case, as well as the appeal filed by CBI seeking death penalty for three of them.
The accused were sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court here in 2008 for the gangrape of Bilkis and murder of her family members during a post-Godhra riot.
On March 3, 2002, a mob attacked Bilkis Bano' house at Randhikpur near Ahmedabad and killed seven members of the family. Bilkis Bano, who was five months pregnant, was allegedly gangraped.
The trial was transferred out of Gujarat for the fear that witnesses might be intimidated or influenced.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
