The Centre told the Supreme Court on Monday it will "shortly" issue a notification for appointment of the chief justice of the Manipur High Court, more than three months after the top court collegium recommended Delhi High Court judge Siddharth Mridul for the post.
In a note submitted to the bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia, the Centre said the files regarding the transfer of 14 high court judges have been cleared and the remaining 12 are under process.
The top court was hearing two pleas, including the one alleging delay by the Centre in clearing the names recommended by the collegium for appointment and transfer of judges.
The top court collegium headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud had on July 5 recommended the appointment of Delhi High Court judge Justice Siddharth Mridul as the chief justice of the Manipur High Court, amid the ethnic turmoil in the border state.
During the hearing on Monday, the bench referred to some "positive developments" and noted that a large number of recommendations by high courts, hitherto pending with the law ministry and not forwarded to the Supreme Court collegium, have finally been forwarded.
It said the SC collegium will now elicit the views of consultee judges on the recommendations made by high courts. The processing will be done at the earliest, the bench said.
After high court collegiums have made their recommendations for appointment of judges, the list is sent to the Union law ministry, which forwards it to the top court. The top court then consults SC judges who have been elevated from the respective high courts about the names suggested by HC collegiums before sending its final recommendation to the law ministry.
On the issue of transfer of 26 high court judges, the bench noted, it is stated that "the files in 14 cases have been cleared and notifications will be issued shortly. In respect to the remaining 12, it is stated to be under process".
"As far as the appointment of a chief justice of a High Court which is pending for considerable time, that too for a sensitive state, it is submitted that the file has been cleared and notification will be issued shortly," it said.
"By the next date, I want this to be done. I am being very, very polite, let me be polite," Justice Kaul observed.
The bench has posted the matter for further hearing on October 20.
The appointment of judges through the collegium system has often become major flashpoint between the Supreme Court and the Centre, with the mechanism drawing criticism from different quarters.
While hearing the matter on September 26, the top court had voiced dismay over the "delay" in the appointment of judges and asked Attorney General R Venkataramani to use his good offices to resolve the issue.
"There were 80 recommendations pending until last week when 10 names were cleared. Now, the figure is 70, of which 26 recommendations are of transfer of judges, seven are reiterations, nine are pending without being returned to the collegium and one case is of appointment of the Chief Justice to a sensitive high court," the bench had said.
All these recommendations are pending since November last year, it said.
The attorney general had sought a week's time to come back with instructions on the pending recommendations for appointment to the high courts.
The top court was hearing the petitions, including the one filed by the Advocates Association Bengaluru seeking contempt action against the Union Ministry of Law and Justice for allegedly not adhering to the timeline set by the court in a 2021 judgement.
On February 13, the top court had told the Centre to make sure that "most of what is expected is done" on issues concerning the appointment and transfer of judges as recommended by the top court collegium.
One of the pleas in the top court has alleged "wilful disobedience" of the timeframe laid down in its April 20, 2021 order to facilitate timely appointment of judges. In that order, the top court had said the Centre should appoint judges within three-four weeks if the collegium reiterates its recommendations unanimously.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Featured Video Of The Day
"Can We Castigate...": An Objection To Chief Justice's Remark On Past Judge "Throwing Baby With Bathwater": Top Court Junks Ruling Against UP Madrasas Will Madrassa Law Stay? Supreme Court To Decide Today: 10 Points Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump: Who Is Winning The US Election Right Now? Equatorial Guinea Civil Servant's Over 400 Sex Tapes Spark Massive Row Live Updates: Trump Says He May Not Challenge Election As Long As "It's Fair" Fake Bomb Threats Linked To Russia Briefly Close Georgia Polling Locations FBI Warns Of Bomb Threats From Russia At US Voting Sites Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump: Who Is Winning The US Election Right Now? Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.