This Article is From Aug 23, 2016

Charge Sheet In Disproportionate Assets Case Against Virbhadra Singh Ready, CBI Tells High Court

Charge Sheet In Disproportionate Assets Case Against Virbhadra Singh Ready, CBI Tells High Court

The Delhi High Court had directed CBI not to arrest Virbhadra Singh. (File Photo)

New Delhi: The CBI today sought the Delhi High Court's permission to submit a charge sheet in a disproportionate assets case against Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh and others, saying it was ready to do so.

However, Justice AK Pathak said he will not hear the matter and transferred it to another bench. He did not give any reason for doing so.

The court said the matter would be listed before the other bench on August 30.

The lawyer for Mr Singh sought two weeks time before the matter was heard, but CBI lawyer Sanjeev Bhandari wanted an earlier date as the agency was ready with its charge sheet.

The Himachal Pradesh High Court in an interim order of October 1, 2015, had restrained the agency from arresting, interrogating or filing a charge sheet against Mr Singh in the case without the court's permission.

The matter was later transferred by Supreme Court to the Delhi High Court, but the interim order has not yet been vacated or stayed.

The Delhi High Court on April 6 this year had directed CBI not to arrest Mr Singh while asking him to join the probe.

The direction had come when the court was disposing of CBI's application seeking vacation of the Himachal Pradesh High Court's order which, the agency claimed, had "seriously held up" its investigation in the case.

On November 5 last year, the top court had transferred Mr Singh's plea from Himachal Pradesh High Court to Delhi High Court, saying it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case but "simply" transferring the petition "in interest of justice and to save the institution(judiciary) from any embarrassment".

The CBI had moved the top court seeking transfer of the case from the Himachal Pradesh High Court to Delhi High Court and setting aside of the interim order granting protection from arrest and other relief to Mr Singh.

Mr Singh had filed a petition in the Himachal Pradesh High Court pleading that searches on his private residence and other premises were conducted with "malafide intentions and political vendetta" by the central investigating agency.

Mr Singh had sought directions from the high court to quash CBI's FIR registered in Delhi against him and others under Sections 13 (2) and 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 109 (punishment for abetment)of IPC and court had dismissed their plea.
.