Washington: Challenging the extraterritorial jurisdiction of US courts, India's Congress party has sought dismissal of a human rights violation case relating to the 1984 anti-Sikh violence filed by a US-based Sikh rights group.
"The presumption against extraterritoriality is a ferocious watchdog protecting American sovereignty," Congress party's attorney Ravi Batra said in a memorandum of law filed on Thursday in a Manhattan court in support of its pending motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ).
"To allow individual nation-states to unilaterally interfere with conduct occurring solely within another nation-state would destroy sovereignty and permit any judge in a foreign nation to issue process against American defendants for conduct occurring solely within the borders of the United States," he said.
"Yet, SFJ and other plaintiffs wish to weaken American sovereignty and upset the comity amongst nations," Batra said.
"Plaintiffs' attempts to ignore sovereignty and binding precedent, while press attractive can injure the foreign relations of the United States," he warned.
The new memorandum also said that SFJ unjustly sought to hold the Congress party, which not a "natural person", liable in a US court for "acts occurring in India nearly three decades ago, involving only residents of India, with no plausible nexus to the United States".
SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun said it would challenge the Congress party's motion to dismiss the human rights violation case.
US federal judge Robert Sweet is set to hear arguments in the case on March 19.
In March 2011, a US court had issued summons against Congress in the class action lawsuit filed by SFJ under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act.
"The presumption against extraterritoriality is a ferocious watchdog protecting American sovereignty," Congress party's attorney Ravi Batra said in a memorandum of law filed on Thursday in a Manhattan court in support of its pending motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ).
"To allow individual nation-states to unilaterally interfere with conduct occurring solely within another nation-state would destroy sovereignty and permit any judge in a foreign nation to issue process against American defendants for conduct occurring solely within the borders of the United States," he said.
"Plaintiffs' attempts to ignore sovereignty and binding precedent, while press attractive can injure the foreign relations of the United States," he warned.
Advertisement
SFJ legal advisor Gurpatwant Singh Pannun said it would challenge the Congress party's motion to dismiss the human rights violation case.
Advertisement
In March 2011, a US court had issued summons against Congress in the class action lawsuit filed by SFJ under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Haryana Congress MLA Surender Panwar Arrested By Probe Agency ED In Mining Case Joe Biden Is The Best Person To Take On Trump, Says His Campaign 7.4- Magnitude Earthquake Hits Northern Chile Woman Dies, Many Feared Trapped After Portion Of Mumbai Building Collapses The 'Fake' CrowdStrike Worker Who Crippled Windows Users Worldwide On Sonu Sood's Post About Kanwar Yatra Order, Kangana Ranaut's Rejoinder On Sonu Sood's Post About Kanwar Yatra Order, Kangana Ranaut's Rejoinder Salma Hayek Is A Garden Full Of Daisies Summed In A Dress Dutch Content Creator Finds Hotel Room For $1.4 In Pak, Internet Reacts Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.