Mumbai: The Bombay High Court today said it would start hearing from December 5 all the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the beef ban legislation in Maharashtra.
A division bench of justices AS Oka and SC Gupte said it will hear the petitions on December 5, 9 and 11 and then assign more dates, if required.
The bench had to be specially constituted by Acting Chief Justice VK Tahilramani after Justice Gautam Patel, who was presiding with Justice AS Oka, recused from hearing the petitions as he had written an article in a newspaper 2012 after the Karnataka government proposed a similar beef ban.
According to the amended Act, the sale of bulls and bullocks in the state is an offence punishable with five-year jail term and Rs 10,000 fine. Besides, possession of meat of a cow, meat of bull or bullock is also an offence for which the punishment prescribed is one-year jail and Rs 2,000 fine under Section 5(D).
Arif Kapadia, a city resident, and Harish Jagtiani, noted lawyer, challenged this provision of law which says mere possession of beef in any place in the state is a crime.
The other petitions were filed by Vishal Sheth, a lawyer, and Shaina Sen, a student. The duo had said, "We are Hindus who are consumers of beef, which is now part of our diet and nutrition sources. The ban on beef and criminalising its sale and possession violates fundamental rights of citizens."
The court was of the view that it cannot temporarily suspend the beef ban as it was hearing petitions challenging the Act.
A division bench of justices AS Oka and SC Gupte said it will hear the petitions on December 5, 9 and 11 and then assign more dates, if required.
The bench had to be specially constituted by Acting Chief Justice VK Tahilramani after Justice Gautam Patel, who was presiding with Justice AS Oka, recused from hearing the petitions as he had written an article in a newspaper 2012 after the Karnataka government proposed a similar beef ban.
According to the amended Act, the sale of bulls and bullocks in the state is an offence punishable with five-year jail term and Rs 10,000 fine. Besides, possession of meat of a cow, meat of bull or bullock is also an offence for which the punishment prescribed is one-year jail and Rs 2,000 fine under Section 5(D).
Advertisement
Arif Kapadia, a city resident, and Harish Jagtiani, noted lawyer, challenged this provision of law which says mere possession of beef in any place in the state is a crime.
Advertisement
The other petitions were filed by Vishal Sheth, a lawyer, and Shaina Sen, a student. The duo had said, "We are Hindus who are consumers of beef, which is now part of our diet and nutrition sources. The ban on beef and criminalising its sale and possession violates fundamental rights of citizens."
Advertisement
The court was of the view that it cannot temporarily suspend the beef ban as it was hearing petitions challenging the Act.
COMMENTS
Advertisement
'What Kind Of Democracy?' Court Raps Cops For Seeking Action On Professor Boyfriend Stabs 20-Year-Old To Death Near Mumbai, Dumps Body In Bushes: Cops 2 Trapped After 3-Storey Building Collapses In Navi Mumbai, Rescue On 3 Students Dead After Flooding In Delhi Coaching Centre Basement At Olympics Opening Ceremony, Drag Parody Of 'The Last Supper' Draws Flak Kamala Harris Cuts Down Donald Trump's Lead Sharply, Show Latest Polls Will Quit Politics If Attempts Are Made To Disturb Reservation: Praful Patel DSSSB Exam Schedule 2024 Released For Recruitment To Various Posts AAP's Atishi Calls For Meeting After Delhiites Complain Of Blue Tap Water Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.