The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its order on a plea by sacked IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt seeking the recusal of Justice MR Shah from hearing his petition to submit additional evidence to support his appeal in the Gujarat High Court against conviction in a 1990 custodial death case.
His lawyer contended that there was a reasonable apprehension of bias as Justice Shah had castigated the petitioner as a high court judge while hearing his petition linked to the same FIR, but it was opposed by the counsel for the Gujarat government and the complainant who called it "forum shopping" and asked why he had not objected earlier.
A top court bench of justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar said it would pass the order on Wednesday after it heard submissions from senior advocates Devadatt Kamat, appearing for Bhatt, Maninder Singh, representing the Gujarat government, and Atmaram Nadkarni, appearing for the complainant in the case.
Bhatt had filed the appeal in the high court challenging his conviction in the custodial death case of Prabhudas Vaishnani, who was caught by Jamnagar police after a communal riot.
At the outset, Kamat submitted that Justice Shah had passed strictures and castigated the petitioner while hearing Bhatt's petition arising out of the same FIR as a high court judge.
"I have the highest respect for this court. But justice should not only be done but also seen to be done. Judicial propriety demands that your lordship may not hear the matter," Kamat said, adding that the issue is of reasonable apprehension of bias.
Singh opposed Bhatt's plea of recusal and said there is no bonafide in his submission as several other cases have been heard by Justice Shah where no such prayer was made.
"You cannot have prayer for recusal on the ground of selective basis. Selective prayer for recusal would constitute contempt of court," Singh said.
Nadkarni echoed the views of the state government and said objection has to be taken at the first available opportunity.
"This is forum shopping. Most of the courts have passed strictures against him (Bhatt) for causing a delay in the hearing of the case," he said.
In August 2022, Bhatt had withdrawn his plea in the top court seeking suspension of his life sentence in the 30-year-old custodial death case.
The high court had earlier refused to suspend Bhatt's sentence and observed he had had scant respect for courts and deliberately tried to misuse the process of law. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in June 2019 in the case.
The case relates to the custodial death of Prabhudas Vaishnani, who was among 133 people caught by Jamnagar police after a communal riot broke out following a bandh call in view of BJP leader L K Advani's Rath Yatra.
Subsequently, his brother lodged an FIR accusing Bhatt, who was then posted as additional superintendent of police in Jamnagar, and six other policemen of torturing Vaishnani to death in custody.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Featured Video Of The Day
Explained: How Air Pollution Could Be Impacting Your Mental Health
Poetry To UK Precedent: What Went Into Landmark 'Bulldozer Justice' Verdict Man With Explosives Tries To Enter Brazil Supreme Court, Dies In Blast Supreme Court's Demolition Verdict Will Help Curb Organised Crime: UP Baba Siddique Shooter Waited Near Hospital For 30 Minutes To Confirm Death Vivek Ramaswamy's Old Speech Goes Viral Ahead Of 'DOGE' Appointment Poetry To UK Precedent: What Went Into Landmark 'Bulldozer Justice' Verdict Prayagraj Students Protest Job Exams Schedule, Officials Look For Way Out No GRAP 3 Anti-Pollution Measures In Smog-Hit Delhi. Minister Explains Why Mahindra Thar Roxx, XUV 3XO, and XUV400 Bag 5-Star BNCAP Ratings: Video Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.