This Article is From Jul 29, 2015

Delhi High Court Exempts Smriti Irani from Personal Appearance in Defamation Case

Delhi High Court Exempts Smriti Irani from Personal Appearance in Defamation Case

File photo of Union Human Resources Development Minister, Smriti Irani

New Delhi: Delhi High Court today exempted Union HRD minister Smriti Irani from personal appearance in a criminal defamation case filed by Congress leader Sanjay Nirupam.

Justice Suresh Kait issued notice to Mr Nirupam on Ms Irani's plea, who also sough quashing of the summons issued to her by a trial court on June 6, 2014. She has also sought quashing of the complaint filed by the former Congress MP.

"Petitioner (Irani) exempted from appearing in the trial court. Notice issued to the complainant (Sanjay Nirupam is the complainant before the trial court)," the court said.

The court has fixed the matter for August 13 for hearing arguments on the plea filed by the Union Minister.

Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh and advocate Anil Soni, appearing for Ms Irani, today contended before the high court that "the respondent (Mr Nirupam) had filed a counter complaint against Ms Irani after ten months having summoned in my (Ms Irani) defamation case against him."

In the present case, Mr Nirupam had filed the complaint against Irani alleging that on December 20, 2012, when assembly election results of Gujarat were announced, the BJP leader had made "defamatory and scurrilous comments" against him during a TV debate "by making direct aspersions on the character of the complainant."

Mr Nirupam had said that he had sent a legal notice to Ms Irani through his counsel on July 25 last year asking her to tender an "unconditional public apology" for allegedly making defamatory comments against him but she did not reply to it.

Earlier, the union minister had also filed a defamation complaint against Mr Nirupam for allegedly defaming her during the same debate on the private news channel and the court had framed charges against him for allegedly using derogatory and indecent language against her.

On her complaint, the court had put Mr Nirupam on trial under sections 500 (defamation) and 509 (uttering any word or making any gesture intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of the IPC.
   
If convicted, section 500 of the IPC entails a simple imprisonment for two years or fine or both. Section 509 of IPC carries a simple jail term of one year or fine or both.

Ms Irani, a Rajya Sabha member, had claimed in her complaint that Mr Nirupam had allegedly questioned her credentials to analyse poll results given her background as a TV actress.
.