This Article is From Apr 26, 2022

No House Arrest For Activist Gautam Navlakha, Will Stay In Jail: Court

The high court directed Taloja prison to provide Gautam Navlakha with medical kits and aid

Advertisement
India News

Gautam Navlakha sought house custody instead of judicial custody

Mumbai:

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea filed by activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist link case, seeking that he be placed under house arrest instead of judicial custody in Taloja jail as it lacked basic facilities.

A bench of Justices SB Shukre and GA Sanap dismissed the plea and said that if Mr Navlakha had any grievances pertaining to the lack of medical aid and basic facilities at Taloja jail - the grounds he had cited while seeking house arrest - he should inform the special National Investigation Agency, or NIA, court about it.

The high court directed the superintendent of Taloja prison in Navi Mumbai, where Mr Navlakha is lodged as an undertrial in the case, to provide him with medical kits and aid.

"The present petition is dismissed. The petitioner will be at liberty to bring to the attention of the presiding officer of the special NIA court, the grievances in respect of difficulties faced by him in prison," the bench said.

The officer is directed to ensure the grievance is redressed within parameters of the law, it said.

Advertisement

Mr Navlakha had approached the high court earlier this year through advocate Yug Chaudhry, seeking that he be shifted to house custody instead of judicial custody.

The activist had said that he was a senior citizen and suffered from several health ailments.

Advertisement

The trial in the case was unlikely to begin soon, Mr Chaudhry had said urging the court to impose whatever conditions it deemed fit, but to allow Mr Navlakha to be shifted out of Taloja jail and placed under house custody.

The NIA had urged the high court not to grant Mr Navlakha the relief of house arrest, arguing that it would result in difficulties, including the inability to prevent him from using social media while out of prison.

Advertisement

NIA counsel Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh had said that the grounds raised by Mr Chaudhry for house arrest were common grievances such as Mr Navlakha suffering from hypertension and the prison being overcrowded.

The probe agency said it was common knowledge that India was a crowded nation and that the city of Mumbai was overcrowded. Therefore, Taloja jail being overcrowded was not an adequate reason to grant house arrest.

Advertisement

The Maharashtra government had also opposed Mr Navlakha's plea and informed the bench that the prison authorities will provide medical care to him.

Advertisement