This Article is From May 20, 2011

Enforcement Directorate to probe money-laundering case against Amar Singh

Enforcement Directorate to probe money-laundering case against Amar Singh
Allahabad: There's more trouble for Amar Singh. The Allahabad High Court today directed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to investigate the Rs 500-crore money laundering case against the Rajya Sabha MP, saying the matter needed a thorough probe as it had "national ramifications".

The court gave the direction while dismissing a petition filed by the former Samajwadi Party general secretary who had challenged an FIR lodged in Kanpur nearly two years ago accusing him of various financial irregularities when the party was in power in Uttar Pradesh.

"Money laundering poses a serious threat to financial system integrity. It may emerge as a parallel economic system within a country controlled by a few. This may destabilise and perish a sound economy", a division bench comprising Justices Imtiyaz Murtaza and S S Tiwari said.

"We are of the firm view that it is a pre-eminently fit case for exercise of extra-ordinary power and the matter needs thorough probe by Special Cell as the matter has national ramifications", they said.

The court also asked the ED to commence the investigation "within two weeks" and submit a status report before the court within a month of the commencement of the probe.

Singh had moved the court challenging an FIR lodged at Babupurwa Police Station in Kanpur on October 15, 2009 by a local resident Shiv Kant Tripathi under various sections of the IPC, the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Money Laundering Act.

Tripathi had alleged that Singh, as the chairman of the Uttar Pradesh Development Council, had indulged in financial irregularities to the tune of Rs 500 crores by investing money in fake companies and transferring money to shell companies in Kolkata.

The petitioner also moved the court with the prayer that the issue be probed by the ED.

The petitions by Singh and Tripathi were clubbed together and heard by the bench which had reserved its judgement on March 28.

Senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani, who had argued on behalf of Singh, had described the FIR lodged against his client as "clearly an act of malice and fraud" aimed at "settling political scores" and, hence, was "liable to be quashed".

However, the court said it found "no substance in the submissions that the proceeding is liable to be quashed on grounds of malafide and political rivalries".

Taking note of the fact that "the companies which are alleged to be shell companies are registered in various states", the court held "the ED being a central agency shall be the appropriate cell capable of carrying out a thorough probe.

It directed that the matter be listed for further hearing in the first week of July when the authorities shall appear in person and submit the first status report.

(With PTI inputs)
.