Following are the top observations by the Supreme Court from Mohammed Zubair's bail order:
He (Mohammed Zubair) is trapped in a vicious cycle of the criminal process where the process has itself become the punishment. The machinery of criminal justice has been relentlessly employed against the petitioner.
It also appears that certain dormant FIRs from 2021 were activated as certain new FIRs were registered, thereby compounding the difficulties faced by the petitioner.
Arrest is not meant to be and must not be used as a punitive tool because it results in one of the gravest possible consequences emanating from criminal law: the loss of personal liberty.
Individuals must not be punished solely on the basis of allegations, and without a fair trial.
When the power to arrest is exercised without application of mind and without due regard to the law, it amounts to an abuse of power.
The criminal law and its processes ought not to be instrumentalized as a tool of harassment.
(Supreme Court on UP government's request for imposing bail condition that he must not tweet) The courts while imposing bail conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While doing so, conditions that would result in the deprivation of rights and liberties must be eschewed.
Merely because the complaints filed against the petitioner arise from posts that were made by him on a social media platform, a blanket anticipatory order preventing him from tweeting cannot be made.
A blanket order directing the petitioner to not express his opinion - an opinion that he is rightfully entitled to hold as an active participating citizen - would be disproportionate to the purpose of imposing conditions on bail. The imposition of such a condition would tantamount to a gag order against the petitioner. Gag orders have a chilling effect on the freedom of speech.
According to the petitioner, he is a journalist who is the co-founder of a fact checking website and he uses Twitter as a medium of communication to dispel false news and misinformation in this age of morphed images, clickbait, and tailored videos. Passing an order restricting him from posting on social media would amount to an unjustified violation of the freedom of speech and expression, and the freedom to practice his profession.
"Complete Failure": Supreme Court On Solid Waste Management Rules In Delhi Supreme Court Questions Centre On Maternity Leave Restrictions For Adoptive Mothers Top Court To Hear Plea Over Fireball Use Against Elephants In West Bengal Schools Go Online, No Entry For Trucks As Delhi Air Pollution Worsens X User Seeks Relief For Middle Class. Nirmala Sitharaman Responds 2 Women Try To Save Friend From Drowning In Swimming Pool, All Of Them Die "Salwar Caught Fire But...": How UP Nurse Saved Over Dozen Babies Infant Kidnapped From Delhi Hospital Rescued From UP Rail Station China Doctor Injects Partner With Anaesthesia To Treat Insomnia, She Dies Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.