Ahmed Patel had moved the Supreme Court against the high court order (File Photo)
The Supreme Court today asked the Gujarat High Court to decide afresh the plea of senior Congress leader Ahmed Patel challenging the maintainability of a petition filed by a BJP leader against his election to the Rajya Sabha.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud said Patel's plea against the petition of BJP leader Balwantsinh Rajput required "de novo" (fresh) adjudication.
Mr Patel was elected to the Rajya Sabha last year after defeating Mr Rajput, who had quit Congress to join the BJP.
The win for the Congress leader had come after the Election Commission had cancelled the votes of rebel Congress MLAs, Bhola Bhai Gohil and Raghav Bhai Patel. This had brought down the requirement for an outright victory for a candidate to 44 from 45.
Soon after Mr Patel got elected, Mr Rajput filed a petition in the high court challenging the poll panel's decision to invalidate the votes of the two rebel MLAs. Had these votes been counted, he would have defeated Patel, Rajput had contended in the High Court.
Mr Rajput had also alleged that Patel had taken the party MLAs to a resort in Bengaluru before the election, which, he claimed, amounted to bribing the voters.
Mr Patel had challenged Rajput's plea and sought its dismissal for not serving the respondents an attested copy of the petition as required under the law.
The high court, however, rejected his plea and said the petitioner had substantially complied with the provisions of law and the defects could be easily cured.
Mr Patel moved the top court against the high court order, saying that Mr Rajput's petition was "devoid of merits" and failed to show any "cause of action".
The senior Congress leader has challenged the April 22 order of the high court which had dismissed his plea.
He had contended before the high court that the election petition was "not at all maintainable" and should be "dismissed at the threshold" as it violated the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
The plea said the decision of the poll panel cannot be challenged in an election petition. "Election Application...was preferred by the Petitioner (Balwantsinh Rajput) under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC praying for dismissal of the Election Petition for non disclosure of cause of action," it said, while seeking a stay on the proceedings before the Gujarat High Court.