This Article is From May 23, 2022

Gyanvapi Case Highlights: Hearing In Court Of District Judge In Varanasi

Gyanvapi Mosque Case Highlights: Hearing began in Court Of District Judge in Varanasi today after the Supreme Court on Friday ordered the transfer of the Gyanvapi mosque case from the civil judge to the district judge, Varanasi.

Gyanvapi Case Highlights: Hearing In Court Of District Judge In Varanasi

Gyanvapi Mosque Case: Supreme Court had earlier said, "This is a complex and sensitive matter."

Varanasi:

Hearing began in Court Of District Judge in Varanasi today after the Supreme Court on Friday ordered the transfer of the Gyanvapi mosque case from the civil judge to the district judge, Varanasi in a view complexity of matters.

A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant and PS Narasimha ordered that a "senior and experienced" judicial officer of Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service should examine the case.

The bench said District Judge should decide the maintainability of the civil suit in the Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath on priority as sought by Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Varanasi.

"Having regard to the sensitivity of this civil suit, this case before the civil judge Varanasi shall stand transferred and be heard by a senior and experienced judicial officer of UP Judicial services. Thus the case was transferred from Civil Judge (senior division), Varanasi to District Judge, Varanasi. The application filed by the plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC shall be decided on priority by the District Judge on the transfer of suit," the bench ordered.

Here are the Highlights on the hearing:

May 23, 2022 14:51 (IST)
Court Reserves Order For Tomorrow
Court has reserved its orders for tomorrow on what procedure will be followed for the hearing and when the actual hearing will begin.
May 23, 2022 14:28 (IST)
What Supreme Court Had Said Earlier In Gyanvapi Mosque Case
The Supreme Court, hearing a petition challenging the filming of Varanasi's Gyanvapi mosque, said that the case will be heard by an experienced judge in Uttar Pradesh. Here are five highlights from the Supreme Court decision.
.