NEW DELHI: Amid an ongoing face-off between the judiciary and the centre over the elevation of Justice KM Joseph, the Supreme Court on Friday made its displeasure clear over the government's delay in processing appointments of chief justices for two high courts.
"Tell us, how many names (recommended by the collegium) are pending with you," the court asked the centre's top law officer KK Venugopal.
When Mr Venugopal said "I will have to find out", the court shot back: "When it comes to the government, you say "we will find out'."
The sparring continued.
It comes against the backdrop of a face-off over the elevation of Uttarakhand Chief Justice Joseph to the Supreme Court recommended in January. Last month, the centre declined to appoint him. The top court's group of senior judges met this week to discuss the appointment. There was no final decision but the judges are expected to meet again next week to convey its final verdict.
There have been suggestions from within the top court that they should issue a judicial binding order to see the appointment through but Chief Justice Dipak Misra hasn't favoured this approach.
On Friday, Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta were hearing a petition by a man who had sought transfer of his case from the Manipur High Court to the Gauhati High Court. Since the Manipur high court is short of judges, the top court widened the ambit of the case and started to look at the shortage of judges.
At Friday's hearing, it became about who was responsible for a large number of vacancies in the high courts.
KK Venugopal came straight to the point.
The Attorney General argued that collegium, or a group of top Supreme Court judges mandated to recommend names to the President, wasn't sending enough names.
"Some high courts have 40 vacancies and recommendation of the collegium is only for three. And the government is being told that we are tardy in filing up the vacancy," he said.
"The collegium will have to see the broad picture and recommend more names," Mr Venugopal said, asserting that the government could not do anything "if there is no collegium recommendation".
The collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India, is a 3-member body to select high court judges and chief justices. For selecting Supreme Court judges, the collegium has five members.
During the back and forth between the centre's top law officer and the bench, Mr Venugopal refused to give a date by when the two chief justices recommended by the Supreme Court collegium would be appointed. He said the orders would be issued "shortly".
"What shortly? Shortly could be three months," the bench retorted.
Mr Venugopal stood his ground.
He also pointed to a recommendation of the collegium to appoint a judge in the Manipur High Court and specifying that he would continue to function in Gauhati High Court.
"That time, only two judges were there in Manipur High Court. It should not have been said that he (Justice Songkhupchung Serto) would continue in Gauhati High Court. It was necessary to bring him back to Manipur High Court," he said, describing the collegium's resolution as "very strange".
To this, the bench observed, "may be the collegium does not want to get him back to Manipur. We do not know".
"Tell us, how many names (recommended by the collegium) are pending with you," the court asked the centre's top law officer KK Venugopal.
When Mr Venugopal said "I will have to find out", the court shot back: "When it comes to the government, you say "we will find out'."
It comes against the backdrop of a face-off over the elevation of Uttarakhand Chief Justice Joseph to the Supreme Court recommended in January. Last month, the centre declined to appoint him. The top court's group of senior judges met this week to discuss the appointment. There was no final decision but the judges are expected to meet again next week to convey its final verdict.
Advertisement
On Friday, Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta were hearing a petition by a man who had sought transfer of his case from the Manipur High Court to the Gauhati High Court. Since the Manipur high court is short of judges, the top court widened the ambit of the case and started to look at the shortage of judges.
Advertisement
KK Venugopal came straight to the point.
Advertisement
"Some high courts have 40 vacancies and recommendation of the collegium is only for three. And the government is being told that we are tardy in filing up the vacancy," he said.
Advertisement
The collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India, is a 3-member body to select high court judges and chief justices. For selecting Supreme Court judges, the collegium has five members.
Advertisement
"What shortly? Shortly could be three months," the bench retorted.
Mr Venugopal stood his ground.
He also pointed to a recommendation of the collegium to appoint a judge in the Manipur High Court and specifying that he would continue to function in Gauhati High Court.
"That time, only two judges were there in Manipur High Court. It should not have been said that he (Justice Songkhupchung Serto) would continue in Gauhati High Court. It was necessary to bring him back to Manipur High Court," he said, describing the collegium's resolution as "very strange".
To this, the bench observed, "may be the collegium does not want to get him back to Manipur. We do not know".
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Appointment Of 7 High Court Chief Justices In A First, Judge From Manipur Recommended For Elevation To Supreme Court Can't Disclose Reason Why Supreme Court Collegium Rejects Candidates: High Court Trainee IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Called Cops Home, Spoke For 2 Hours What Trump Rally Shooter Did On Last Day Of His Life "Demand Of Every Patriotic Indian Is...": Rahul Gandhi On Doda Terror Attack Paytm Rapped By Markets Regulator Over Transactions With Banking Subsidiary Supreme Court Gets 2 New Judges, Its First From Manipur Adani Green's Innovative Projects Advancing India's Zero-Emission Goal: US Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.