New Delhi: The Himachal Pradesh government was "blocking" CBI probe in the disproportionate assets case against Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh and others by "acting as a proxy" for him, the agency told the Delhi High Court today.
"State (Himachal Pradesh) is blocking the investigation by contesting the matter by acting as a proxy for the Chief Minister. It should actually support us," Additional Solicitor General (ASG) PS Patwalia, appearing for CBI, told Justice Vipin Sanghi.
The ASG said the state's argument that its police and courts would have probed the matter "pulls wool over no one's eyes".
"The Chief Minister is the executive head of the state. Police is under the state's Home Department and the Home portfolio is with the CM," he said during arguments on petitions filed by Mr Singh and others challenging the CBI's jurisdiction to probe the case.
The day's arguments commenced with the Advocate General of the state contending that "a subject of the state has been put to discriminatory treatment".
In the present case the 'subject' was the Chief Minister and his family members, he said and questioned how such "indulgence" can be shown by an agency which was "not authorised under the law".
He said police was a state subject under the Constitution and a central agency was claiming that it was also authorised to investigate the matter.
The Advocate General also said the state police and the entire hierarchy of courts were there to deal with the matter and added that the state had not consented to transferring it from Himachal Pradesh to Delhi.
He said the CBI was set up under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 and when this Bill was proposed, it was said that the agency can conduct probe in all provinces "with the consent of the provinces".
He claimed that under the Act, CBI's jurisdiction was confined to union territories and added that there has to be consent from a state for extending the agency's jurisdiction there.
"State (Himachal Pradesh) is blocking the investigation by contesting the matter by acting as a proxy for the Chief Minister. It should actually support us," Additional Solicitor General (ASG) PS Patwalia, appearing for CBI, told Justice Vipin Sanghi.
The ASG said the state's argument that its police and courts would have probed the matter "pulls wool over no one's eyes".
The day's arguments commenced with the Advocate General of the state contending that "a subject of the state has been put to discriminatory treatment".
Advertisement
He said police was a state subject under the Constitution and a central agency was claiming that it was also authorised to investigate the matter.
Advertisement
He said the CBI was set up under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 and when this Bill was proposed, it was said that the agency can conduct probe in all provinces "with the consent of the provinces".
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Avoid Seeking Appreciation On Social Media: CBI Director Tells New Officers Enough Evidence To Prosecute Coaching Centre Deaths Accused: CBI To Court CBI Arrests 2 Delhi Police Officers For Allegedly Taking Rs 10 Lakh Bribe MK Stalin Asks Centre To Recall Tamil Nadu Governor In Row Over Anthem Tamil Nadu Police's Counter Petition In Supreme Court Against Sadhguru Delhi Ex Minister Satyendar Jain Leaves Jail, Chief Minister Greets Him Harris, Trump Barnstorm Key State Michigan, Where Polls Say They're Tied 2 Brothers Found Dead Amid Rituals In Chhattisgarh: Cops Israel And Iran-Backed Foes Hamas And Hezbollah Vow More War Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.