New Delhi: Defending the Supreme Court's verdict on the appointment of judges, Justice J S Khehar said that nothing happened "secretly" in the collegium system and that the executive always exchanged their views in "black and white".
Justice J S Khehar was heading the five-judge Constitution bench that delivered the verdict rejecting the National Judicial Appointments Commission for the appointment of judges.
Analysing step-by-step the "Memorandum of Procedure" being followed in the collegium system, he said, "It is clear, that there is a complete comity of purpose between the judiciary and the political-executive in the matter of selection and appointment of High Court Judges. And between them, there is clear transparency also. As views are exchanged in writing, views and counter-views, are in black and white. Nothing happens secretly, without the knowledge of the participating constitutional functionaries."
Justice Khehar, in his judgement, dealt separately the three issues that included a plea seeking his recusal, reference of the petitions against the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act to a bench of either nine or more judges and the decision on merits.
Striking down the NJAC Act and the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, he said that the composition of NJAC, to which the Chief Justice of India and two senior most judges of the Supreme Court would be members, did not provide "adequate representation to the judicial component" in the panel and were insufficient to preserve the primacy of the judiciary.
"I have arrived at the conclusion, that clauses (a)the CJI, Chairperson, ex officio and (b) two other senior Judges of Supreme Court as Members, ex officio, of Article 124A(1) do not provide an adequate representation, to the judicial component in the NJAC, clauses (a) and (b) of Article 124A(1) are insufficient to preserve the primacy of the judiciary... The same are accordingly, violative of the principle of "independence of the judiciary", Justice Khehar said.
Justice J S Khehar was heading the five-judge Constitution bench that delivered the verdict rejecting the National Judicial Appointments Commission for the appointment of judges.
Analysing step-by-step the "Memorandum of Procedure" being followed in the collegium system, he said, "It is clear, that there is a complete comity of purpose between the judiciary and the political-executive in the matter of selection and appointment of High Court Judges. And between them, there is clear transparency also. As views are exchanged in writing, views and counter-views, are in black and white. Nothing happens secretly, without the knowledge of the participating constitutional functionaries."
Striking down the NJAC Act and the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, he said that the composition of NJAC, to which the Chief Justice of India and two senior most judges of the Supreme Court would be members, did not provide "adequate representation to the judicial component" in the panel and were insufficient to preserve the primacy of the judiciary.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Not In Open Court: Chief Justice On Review Petition In Same-Sex Marriage Supreme Court To Consider Requests To Review Verdict On Same-Sex Marriage "No Error": Supreme Court Rejects Review Petitions Against Article 370 Verdict Indian Airports, Borders On Alert As Global Mpox Cases Rise: 10 Points "My Intention Was To...": Sudha Murty Clarifies Raksha Bandhan Post UK Tech Tycoon Missing After Superyacht Sinks Off Sicily In Italy US Intelligence Officials Say Iran Responsible For Trump Campaign Hack Pakistan Ex-PM Imran Khan Applies To Be Oxford Chancellor From Jail LIVE: Democratic Convention Begins, Kamala Harris To Accept Nomination Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.