In a landmark judgement towards eradication of criminalisation of politics, the Supreme Court today ruled that if any elected representative suppressed information on pending criminal cases, it could set aside their election.
"Non-disclosure of criminal antecedents amounts to corrupt practice by the candidates. The crucial recognized ideal which is required to be realised is eradication of criminalisation of politics and corruption in public life," a two-judge bench, headed by Justice Dipak Misra, observed.
"Disclosure of criminal antecedents of a candidate, especially, pertaining to heinous or serious offence or offences relating to corruption or moral turpitude at the time of filing of nomination paper as mandated by law is a categorical imperative," the court added.
The judgement came in a 2006 case relating to the nullification of election of a panchayat member in Tamil Nadu's Coimbatore by the Madras High Court which found him guilty of not disclosing pending criminal cases against him while filing his nomination for elections. He had challenged the order in the Supreme Court which today upheld the lower court's order and imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on him.
"Fashion Parade Going On?" Chief Justice Pulls Up Lawyer Without Neckband "What Is This...": Supreme Court Junks Bilkis Bano Convicts' Bail Pleas Restrictive Statutory Provisions Don't Prevent Bail: Supreme Court The 'Fake' CrowdStrike Worker Who Crippled Windows Users Worldwide On Sonu Sood's Post About Kanwar Yatra Order, Kangana Ranaut's Rejoinder Woman Dies As Portion Of Mumbai Building Collapses After Heavy Rain In Madhya Pradesh, Panel Of IAS Officers To Tackle Stray Dog Menace Union Minister Chirag Paswan Backs Caste Census, But Has A Big Concern 14 Indians Rescued From 'Cyber-Slavery' In Cambodia Wait To Return Home Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.