Chennai: The Madras High Court has come to the rescue of a mother who has been fighting for nearly 25 years to get compensation for the death of her son, a truck driver, in a road mishap. Lokeswaran died on May 18, 1993 following a head-on collision with a bus. His mother first moved the competent authority (Commissioner) under the Workmen's Compensation Act for compensation, but lost the claim.
Negating the objection of an insurance company, Justice N Seshasayee of the Madras High Court confirmed the compensation of Rs 3,47,000 with interest passed by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal or MACT.
Since the autopsy report did not mention the victim's name, the bonafides of the claim was suspected and the matter was decided against the claimant by the Commissioner.
When the mother moved MACT, the insurance firm objected, saying the claimant should not move the motor accident tribunal and may only prefer an appeal under the WC Act. MACT, however, held that the claimant would be entitled to compensation and awarded Rs 3.47 lakh with interest at 7.5 per cent to the woman.
The insurance firm appealed against it, contending that the claimant had already elected to move one of the forums seeking compensation. It is impermissible for her to make a claim twice over and hence the petition was not maintainable in law as per the doctrine of election, it contended.
The judge said that in respect of a tribunal under the WC Act, it implies a decision on quantification of a claim by computing the value of loss of life and in the present case it was not done.
"Sorry, we have kept you waiting this long to secure your right," he told the victim's mother.
The judge noted that the Workmen's Compensation Tribunal had not even felt it their duty to compute the value of loss of a life.
The judge further said the tribunal also had not analysed if the mother of the victim can be blamed for the fault of the doctor who did the autopsy and deny her compensation.
As regards the doctrine of election cited by the insurance firm to object to the claim of the victim's mother, the judge noted that it would operate only when the forum of first choice had conclusively quantified the compensation payable and it was not applicable to the present case.
Negating the objection of an insurance company, Justice N Seshasayee of the Madras High Court confirmed the compensation of Rs 3,47,000 with interest passed by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal or MACT.
Since the autopsy report did not mention the victim's name, the bonafides of the claim was suspected and the matter was decided against the claimant by the Commissioner.
The insurance firm appealed against it, contending that the claimant had already elected to move one of the forums seeking compensation. It is impermissible for her to make a claim twice over and hence the petition was not maintainable in law as per the doctrine of election, it contended.
Advertisement
"Sorry, we have kept you waiting this long to secure your right," he told the victim's mother.
Advertisement
The judge further said the tribunal also had not analysed if the mother of the victim can be blamed for the fault of the doctor who did the autopsy and deny her compensation.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Why Is Sadhguru Encouraging Women To Live Like Hermits, Asks Madras High Court Supreme Court Fines Man Rs 1.2 Lakh For 'Legal Misadventure' High Court Revives 2017 Breach of Privilege Case Against MK Stalin "Sit Quiet": Bhavish Aggarwal As Kunal Kamra Flags Ola EV Issue Dinner With Kim Jong Un Or George Soros? S Jaishankar Was Asked. His Reply Egypt's Pyramids Built Using An Incredibly Clever Machine: Study Rajasthan Police Constable 2024 Computer Based Test Result Released Video Shows Pakistani Influencer Riding A Chained Tiger, Internet Is Angry EasyJet Flight Makes Emergency Landing After Passengers Brawl Mid-Air Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.