Washington:
Home Minister P Chidambaram has said there is nothing wrong with the Gujarat affidavit. Speaking out for the first time on the controversy, he said the Gujarat government cannot try to use the home ministry affidavit to defend itself against charges of carrying out a fake encounter.
The minister said the affidavit was only meant to be an intelligence input, not conclusive proof of guilt, much less a reason for killing anyone in cold blood.
"What is wrong with the affidavit? To the best of my knowledge the affidavit says that intelligence inputs were shared with the Gujarat government. That affidavit must be read in context. You cannot read into it what it does not say. I think it is self-evident that intelligence inputs are not evidence, much less conclusive proof. They are just inputs. They are hared with governments on a regular basis. That is not evidence or conclusive proof. It gives leads to investigations further enquiry. If a state government acts as though intelligence inputs are evidence or conclusive proof, I am sorry for that government.
"Certainly no one suggested that based on an intelligence input you should kill someone. I think too much is being attributed to that affidavit if it is meant to defend the government of Gujarat against the excesses that may have been committed by its police I am sorry for the government of Gujarat and the manner in which it runs its police administration."
Earlier, the Congress said that the party might want the home ministry to have a re-look at the affidavit.
"We would certainly want the government to take a look and the government is fully entitled to a magisterial enquiry in the high court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court to explain, elaborate and interpret the affidavit given earlier," Congress Spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi told NDTV.
The minister said the affidavit was only meant to be an intelligence input, not conclusive proof of guilt, much less a reason for killing anyone in cold blood.
"What is wrong with the affidavit? To the best of my knowledge the affidavit says that intelligence inputs were shared with the Gujarat government. That affidavit must be read in context. You cannot read into it what it does not say. I think it is self-evident that intelligence inputs are not evidence, much less conclusive proof. They are just inputs. They are hared with governments on a regular basis. That is not evidence or conclusive proof. It gives leads to investigations further enquiry. If a state government acts as though intelligence inputs are evidence or conclusive proof, I am sorry for that government.
"Certainly no one suggested that based on an intelligence input you should kill someone. I think too much is being attributed to that affidavit if it is meant to defend the government of Gujarat against the excesses that may have been committed by its police I am sorry for the government of Gujarat and the manner in which it runs its police administration."
Earlier, the Congress said that the party might want the home ministry to have a re-look at the affidavit.
"We would certainly want the government to take a look and the government is fully entitled to a magisterial enquiry in the high court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court to explain, elaborate and interpret the affidavit given earlier," Congress Spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi told NDTV.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
