New Delhi: PJ Thomas, who was removed as Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) by the Supreme Court recently, has appealed to the President.
On March 3, the Supreme Court quashed the appointment of Thomas as CVC, holding that the recommendation made by the high-powered panel - headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh - did not consider chargesheet relating to a corruption case pending against him and therefore, its advice "does not exist in law".
Thomas claimed that judiciary has no right to decide his eligibility for the post without prior reference from the President.
Thomas' lawyer Wills Mathews told NDTV that the Supreme Court judgement was illegal.
"We have requested the President to invoke Article 143...The reason is that three judges' judgement on the CVC is not legally valid because Article 145(3) clearly says that the minimum number of judges required for interpretation of Constitution is five. In effect this judgement is null and void," he said.
"Once it is null and void, it cannot be reviewed. That means there is a Constitutional crisis," Mathews said.
He said only the President can invoke Article 143 and consult the Supreme Court on the legality and validity of the judgement by a three judges' bench.
"Today we submitted a representation to the President's office in this regard," he added.
Read the complete plea here:
On March 3, the Supreme Court quashed the appointment of Thomas as CVC, holding that the recommendation made by the high-powered panel - headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh - did not consider chargesheet relating to a corruption case pending against him and therefore, its advice "does not exist in law".
Thomas claimed that judiciary has no right to decide his eligibility for the post without prior reference from the President.
"We have requested the President to invoke Article 143...The reason is that three judges' judgement on the CVC is not legally valid because Article 145(3) clearly says that the minimum number of judges required for interpretation of Constitution is five. In effect this judgement is null and void," he said.
Advertisement
He said only the President can invoke Article 143 and consult the Supreme Court on the legality and validity of the judgement by a three judges' bench.
"Today we submitted a representation to the President's office in this regard," he added.
Read the complete plea here:
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Biden "Absolutely" Staying In US Presidential Race, Says His Campaign Chair Ursula Von Der Leyen Wins Second Term As Top EU Leader Trump's Veep Pick JD Vance's Wife And Her "Academically Strong" Family After Retest, Haryana NEET Centre With Most Top Scorers Gave This Result... The 'Fake' CrowdStrike Worker Who Took Credit For Biggest-Ever IT Outage What Recovery Of Austrian Gun 'Steyr AUG' From J&K Terrorists Means Newborn Saved From Dead Mother's Womb After Israel Strikes Gaza Hospital Florida Cops Urge Locals To Stop Taking Selfies With "Depressed" Bear 5 People From Jharkhand's Jamtara Convicted For Money Laundering Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.