Nitish Kumar formed a new government in alliance with BJP on July 29 after winning a trust vote. (File)
Patna:
The Patna High Court today dismissed two Public Interest Litigation or PILs challenging the formation of the new government by Nitish Kumar's Janata Dal United along with the BJP. The court ruling comes days after the Bihar chief minister tendered his resignation and formed a new government in the state in alliance with the BJP following a dramatic break-up with the Rashtriya Janata Dal.
While one PIL was filed by RJD lawmakers Saroj Yadav and Chandan Verma, the second one was filed by Jitendra Kumar, a Samajwadi Party member.
After hearing all parties, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice A K Upadhyay dismissed the two PILs saying no intervention of the court is required, after floor test in the state Assembly.
B C Pandey and Bhupendra Kumar Singh, lawyers on behalf of the petitioners, argued before the court that RJD, the single largest party, was not given a chance for government formation in violation of the Supreme Court judgement in the S R Bommai case and hence the oath of office and secrecy taken by ministers of the new government should be cancelled.
While Advocate General Lalit Kishore appeared on behalf of the state government, Y V Giri was the governor's counsel and the Union government was represented by S D Sanjay.
Y V Giri argued before the court that once the floor test is conducted, nothing else remains as the party clearly proved its majority on the floor of the House.
The new government had furnished a list of 131 MLAs in support of the new government and they acquired the same number of votes during the confidence vote on Friday last which justified the governor's decision to call them for forming a government, Mr Giri said.
He told the court that the same procedure was followed recently in formation of government in Goa.
After hearing all the parties, the bench observed that no intervention was required.
On Friday last, lawyers of the petitioners had mentioned the two cases ahead of the crucial confidence vote and had prayed to the judge to cancel the trust vote since it violated the judgement in the S R Bommai case.
The lawyers had also prayed to the court to issue a directive to invite the leader of the single largest party to form the government.
Principal Additional Advocate General Lalit Kishore and Additional Solicitor General S D Sanjay had termed the PILs on July 28 last as "frivolous".
While one PIL was filed by RJD lawmakers Saroj Yadav and Chandan Verma, the second one was filed by Jitendra Kumar, a Samajwadi Party member.
After hearing all parties, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice A K Upadhyay dismissed the two PILs saying no intervention of the court is required, after floor test in the state Assembly.
B C Pandey and Bhupendra Kumar Singh, lawyers on behalf of the petitioners, argued before the court that RJD, the single largest party, was not given a chance for government formation in violation of the Supreme Court judgement in the S R Bommai case and hence the oath of office and secrecy taken by ministers of the new government should be cancelled.
While Advocate General Lalit Kishore appeared on behalf of the state government, Y V Giri was the governor's counsel and the Union government was represented by S D Sanjay.
Y V Giri argued before the court that once the floor test is conducted, nothing else remains as the party clearly proved its majority on the floor of the House.
The new government had furnished a list of 131 MLAs in support of the new government and they acquired the same number of votes during the confidence vote on Friday last which justified the governor's decision to call them for forming a government, Mr Giri said.
He told the court that the same procedure was followed recently in formation of government in Goa.
After hearing all the parties, the bench observed that no intervention was required.
On Friday last, lawyers of the petitioners had mentioned the two cases ahead of the crucial confidence vote and had prayed to the judge to cancel the trust vote since it violated the judgement in the S R Bommai case.
The lawyers had also prayed to the court to issue a directive to invite the leader of the single largest party to form the government.
Principal Additional Advocate General Lalit Kishore and Additional Solicitor General S D Sanjay had termed the PILs on July 28 last as "frivolous".
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
