Prime Minister Modi's office has been cautioned after answers to RTI queries were delayed.
New Delhi:
The Central Information Commission has cautioned the Prime Minister's Office to adopt "due seriousness" in the handling of Right to Information applications and provide responses within the mandatory time limit.
The matter relates to one Mohammed Khalid Jilani who wanted to know from the Prime Minister's Office whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi had given the messages on the occasions of Bakr-Eid in 2014, and Baravafat and Eid-ul-Fitr in 2015.
Mr Jilani sought to know complete details of the messages, if these were given, along with the mode of communication. He also asked if the Prime Minister had attended any Roza-Iftar get-together in 2014 and 2015, and the details of such programmes.
Mr Jilani claimed before the transparency panel that the response to one of his questions was provided after four months of filing of the application, while the reply for the remaining two questions was given after 10 months.
"After 10 months, the PMO informed me that if I needed this information, I have to go through the website of the PMO. If they had to provide me the link of the website, they could have done so within one month of filing my RTI," Mr Jilani said.
He also claimed that his first appeal to the PM's Office was responded to after 64 days as against 30 days' mandatory limit under the transparency law.
Mr Jilani demanded that a penalty be imposed on the PM's Office for not adhering to mandatory limit of 30 days in responding to RTI application.
The PM's Office, in its response, said it had issued an interim reply stating that the information shall be provided as and when received from the offices concerned.
Chief Information Commissioner RK Mathur said that the information was not provided within the stipulated period of time, however, there was no harmful intent on part of the PM's Office.
Mr Mathur said, "The respondent is advised to be cautious in future and ensure that RTI applications are dealt with due seriousness and information is provided within the stipulated period of time to the appellant. If the CPIO (Central Public Information Officer) has to seek information from some other officers, they may have to be treated as 'deemed' CPIOs and be responsible for providing information within stipulated time limits."
The matter relates to one Mohammed Khalid Jilani who wanted to know from the Prime Minister's Office whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi had given the messages on the occasions of Bakr-Eid in 2014, and Baravafat and Eid-ul-Fitr in 2015.
Mr Jilani sought to know complete details of the messages, if these were given, along with the mode of communication. He also asked if the Prime Minister had attended any Roza-Iftar get-together in 2014 and 2015, and the details of such programmes.
Mr Jilani claimed before the transparency panel that the response to one of his questions was provided after four months of filing of the application, while the reply for the remaining two questions was given after 10 months.
"After 10 months, the PMO informed me that if I needed this information, I have to go through the website of the PMO. If they had to provide me the link of the website, they could have done so within one month of filing my RTI," Mr Jilani said.
He also claimed that his first appeal to the PM's Office was responded to after 64 days as against 30 days' mandatory limit under the transparency law.
Mr Jilani demanded that a penalty be imposed on the PM's Office for not adhering to mandatory limit of 30 days in responding to RTI application.
The PM's Office, in its response, said it had issued an interim reply stating that the information shall be provided as and when received from the offices concerned.
Chief Information Commissioner RK Mathur said that the information was not provided within the stipulated period of time, however, there was no harmful intent on part of the PM's Office.
Mr Mathur said, "The respondent is advised to be cautious in future and ensure that RTI applications are dealt with due seriousness and information is provided within the stipulated period of time to the appellant. If the CPIO (Central Public Information Officer) has to seek information from some other officers, they may have to be treated as 'deemed' CPIOs and be responsible for providing information within stipulated time limits."
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
