New Delhi: The Supreme Court has condemned the encounter that killed Maoist leader Azad, and a journalist named Hemchandra Pandey. Both men were shot by the Andhra police last July in the Adilabad forests near the Maharashtra-Andhra Pradesh border. The manner in which they were killed has been questioned by human rights activists.
"Our republic cannot behave like this and kill its own children," observed the court, adding , "We hope there will be an answer... a good and convincing answer. The government will have to answer so many questions."
The court has given the Centre and the Andhra police six weeks to respond to why a judicial inquiry should not be ordered into the deaths of the two men. Law Minister Veerappa Moily said, "We agree with the court. It's a matter of concern. We want to ensure such things don't happen again."
The post-mortem report allegedly proves that the men were shot at close range. Bullet marks in the men's bodies also contradict the police's account of the manner in which the men were killed.
Azad, whose real name was Cherukuri Rajkumar, was a spokesperson for the Naxals. Pandey has been described by the government as a Naxal, but his wife says he was eliminated because he was an eyewitness to Azad's murder.
The Supreme Court heard two petitions filed by Swami Agnivesh and Bineeta Pandey, who was married to the journalist who was killed with Azad on the night of July 1, 2010. Both petitions said the men died in a fake encounter, and that their rights were violated.
Swami Agnivesh, a Naxal sympathiser who has repeatedly offered to mediate peace talks between the government and the Naxals, says he was in touch with Azad about a ceasefire when the Naxal leader was killed.
"This was a fake encounter, it just shows how the Hyderabad Police gave a post mortem report first and then changed the report and presented another one," said Bineeta Pandey.
"Our republic cannot behave like this and kill its own children," observed the court, adding , "We hope there will be an answer... a good and convincing answer. The government will have to answer so many questions."
The court has given the Centre and the Andhra police six weeks to respond to why a judicial inquiry should not be ordered into the deaths of the two men. Law Minister Veerappa Moily said, "We agree with the court. It's a matter of concern. We want to ensure such things don't happen again."
Azad, whose real name was Cherukuri Rajkumar, was a spokesperson for the Naxals. Pandey has been described by the government as a Naxal, but his wife says he was eliminated because he was an eyewitness to Azad's murder.
Advertisement
The Supreme Court heard two petitions filed by Swami Agnivesh and Bineeta Pandey, who was married to the journalist who was killed with Azad on the night of July 1, 2010. Both petitions said the men died in a fake encounter, and that their rights were violated.
Swami Agnivesh, a Naxal sympathiser who has repeatedly offered to mediate peace talks between the government and the Naxals, says he was in touch with Azad about a ceasefire when the Naxal leader was killed.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
"Makes Muslim Women's Condition Pathetic": Centre On Triple Talaq In Supreme Court Supreme Court Takes Up Doctor's Rape-Murder Case, To Hear Matter On Tuesday US Supreme Court Keeps Block On Rules Protecting Transgender Students Indian Airports, Borders On Alert As Global Mpox Cases Rise: 10 Points "My Intention Was To...": Sudha Murty Clarifies Raksha Bandhan Post Flower Seller Forced To Buy iPhone For Son On Hunger Strike, Internet Reacts Mpox Death Count Crosses 570 As Congo Awaits Vaccines Delhi Nursing Student Found Dead In Locked Room, Cops Suspect Suicide "Hang Him Or Do...": Mother-In-Law Of Kolkata Rape-Murder Case Accused Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.