The Sharad Yadav faction has also staked claims over the JD(U)'s poll symbol
The JD(U) faction led by Sharad Yadav, today approached the Election Commission (EC), claiming that it represented the "real" party and that a majority of the national council members were with it.
The development came on a day the Janta Dal (United) wrote to Mr Yadav, asking him to skip the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) rally in Patna on Sunday and asserted that if he attended it, he would be working "against the party's principles".
It would mean that he has quit the party voluntarily, the JD(U) missive sent to Mr Yadav by its secretary general K C Tyagi, said.
Mr Yadav had earlier said he would be attending the RJD rally and leave for Patna tomorrow. Arun Shrivastav, a close aide of the rebel JD(U) leader and former general secretary of the party who was removed from the position recently, told reporters that their faction had told the EC that a majority of the party workers, national council members and state presidents were with it.
"We are the founder members of the party. How can Nitish Kumar remove us?," he asked, adding that they were not in a "live-in relationship" with the JD(U) president that he could remove them "as per his whims".
The Yadav faction has also staked claims over the JD(U)'s poll symbol (arrow) and the offices allotted to the party. Mr Kumar, the Bihar chief minister, is also the president of the JD(U). All the party MLAs and barring three, all the MPs are with him.
Mr Tyagi had earlier dismissed the claims of the Mr Yadav faction, saying that a rebellion by "two or three persons" could not be described as a split.
The party has removed Mr Yadav as its parliamentary party leader in the Rajya Sabha and also suspended Rajya Sabha member Ali Anwar from the parliamentary party. It has also sacked some office-bearers considered close to Mr Yadav.
Mr Tyagi had said Mr Yadav would be crossing the "
lakshmanrekha" if he attended RJD supremo Lalu Prasad's rally on Sunday, which is likely to see the participation of representatives of several opposition parties.
Mr Tyagi had claimed that the rally was a "cover up" for the corruption charges against Mr Prasad and his family members.
Mr Shrivastav, however, defended Yadav's decision to attend the rally, saying the JD(U) was a member of the Grand Alliance, comprising the RJD and the Congress, and it remained so for Mr Yadav.
Mr Yadav turned against Mr Kumar after the latter dumped the Grand Alliance and formed a new government in Bihar in alliance with the BJP.