A Mumbai court, which denied bail to the accused driver in connection with an accident on the Bandra Worli Sea Link that killed five persons, has said he was driving his sports utility vehicle at 109 kilometres per hour at the time of incident against the stipulated speed limit of 80 kmph.
Moreover, he has received nine e-challans for speeding earlier, which, prima facie, show he had sufficient knowledge that his dangerous act may cause death, the court said.
Additional Sessions Judge VS Gaike denied bail to SUV driver Irfan Abdul Rahim Bilakiya on December 17, the details of the order being made available on Thursday.
Bilakiya, who has a construction business, was returning home from Jogeshwari on October 5 when he allegedly rammed his SUV into three stationary cars and an ambulance on the bridge. Five persons were killed and eight injured in the accident.
He was held for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and other offences under Indian Penal Code provisions.
The accused, through his lawyers from C K Legal, had claimed to be a victim alleging the accident was due to the mismanagement and negligence of the Bandra-Worli Sea Link and government authorities.
His legal team told court he was a victim of failure of the entire system and has been "framed" in the case.
Bilakiya had sought bail claiming the accident was a result of system failure and an outcome of contributory negligence on part of the government authorities who failed to take appropriate safety measures after a mishap that took place at the site some time earlier.
However, the court said the accident, which took so many lives and injured others, was "due to the dangerous acts of the applicant alone", adding the applicant covered a distance of 2.8 kilometres from the toll point on the sea bridge to the accident spot in just 92 seconds.
"It, prima facie, appears he was driving his vehicle on the Bandra-Worli Sea Link at an average speed of 109 kilometres per hour. And as stated by the investigating officer, at one point, at the speed of 144 kilometres per hour," the court said.
"This fact of high speed, coupled with earlier nine e-challans for high speed, prima facie shows he had sufficient knowledge that death may occur due to his dangerous act," the court held.
Further, the act of fleeing from the site of accident without informing anybody also, prima facie, points towards his knowledge that death may occur due to his dangerous act of habitually driving his vehicle at high speed and jumping signals, the court stated.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Featured Video Of The Day
Court Asks To File Case Against Ali Abbas Zafar For Cheating Producer Vashu Bhagnani Mercedes And BMW, Allegedly Racing On Mumbai Sea Link, Crash Into Wagon R Court Convicts 22-Year-Old Man For Winking At Woman, Holding Her Hand Bengaluru Techie Loses Rs 11.8 Crore After "Digital Arrest" "Daughter Doesn't Know Her Mother's Dead": 'Pushpa 2' Stampede Victim's Husband Kolkata Man Gets Divorce As "Imposition Of Wife's Friend" Is Deemed Cruelty In Close Contact With All 7 Indians Hurt In Germany Car Attack: Embassy 10 Morning Habits You Should Consider Adding To Your Routine For Better Health Trump Ally Used Illegal Drugs, Paid For Underage Sex, Finds Probe: Report Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.