The Supreme Court has directed the Central Information Commission and the State Information Commissions to ensure proper implementation of provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 including on proactive disclosure of information by public authorities.
A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud said public accountability is a crucial feature that governs the relationship between 'duty bearers' and 'right holders'.
The Supreme court said power and accountability go hand in hand and noted that while all citizens shall have the 'right to information' under Section 3 of the Act, the co-relative 'duty' in the form of the obligation of public authorities is recognised in Section 4 of the RTI Act.
"We direct that the Central Information Commission and the State Information Commissions shall continuously monitor the implementation of the mandate of Section 4 of the Act as also prescribed by the Department of Personnel and Training in its Guidelines and Memorandums issued from time to time," the bench also comprising justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala said.
Section 4 of the Right to Information Act deals with the obligations of public authorities.
Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act lays down the information which should be disclosed by public authorities on a suo motu or proactive basis. Section 4(2) and Section 4(3) prescribe the method of dissemination of this information.
The Supreme court stated this in a judgement on a plea seeking effective implementation of a provision of the Right to Information Act which mandates public authorities to suo motu disclose vital information about their functioning.
The Supreme court was hearing a plea filed by Kishan Chand Jain seeking effective implementation of the mandate of Section 4 of the RTI Act dealing with the obligations of public authorities.
The PIL contended that the provision is the soul of RTI without which it remains an ornamental law.
The plea also referred to the reports of the Central Information Commission which reflect poor compliance with the mandate of Section 4.
It said that the Department of Personnel and Training had issued an Office Memorandum requiring a third-party audit, which witnessed poor participation.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Featured Video Of The Day
Cop Drives Car With Petrol Pump Staff On Bonnet After Being Asked To Pay
Supreme Court Gets 2 New Judges, First From Manipur Couple Awarded 6 Months In Jail For Bigamy, But With Alternate Prison Time Will Give Land For Bombay High Court Building: Maharashtra To Supreme Court What Trump Rally Shooter Did On Last Day Of His Life Trainee IAS Officer Puja Khedkar Called Cops Home, Spoke For 2 Hours Trump's Vice President Pick Reveals How His Hindu Wife Helped Him Poll Body Gives Aggrieved Candidates Choice On How They Want To Check EVMs IGL Warns Against Fraud Threatening Disconnection: "Be Cautious" Congress Has Always Been Anti-Backward Classes: Amit Shah Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.