The Supreme Court Tuesday reduced a 12-year sentence awarded to a man convicted in a murder case over a stolen pigeon, noting that the incident happened in the spur of the moment and was not premeditated.
A bench of Justices R Subhash Reddy and Hrishikesh Roy allowed an appeal by the man challenging his conviction under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and reduced the term to seven years.
The top court said it is clear from the evidence and other material placed on record that there was no intention to kill the victim.
"It is clear from the evidence on record that the fight had taken place in the spur of the moment and a sudden fight had taken place in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel.
"It was not a premeditated one and as there was no intention on the part of the appellant and co-accused either to cause death or cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, the High Court ought not to have convicted the appellant for the offence under Section 304 Part I (Causing death by negligence) of the IPC," the bench said.
The accused Kala Singh and the victim - who had stolen the pigeon - had a sudden fight and the co-accused (Kehar Singh) hit him with his rod on the head resulting in his death, as per the prosecution.
It further alleged that the appellant and co-accused threw the body of Shamber Singh in the minor canal.
The top court said that in the absence of any intention on the part of the accused, it was of the view that it is a clear case where the conviction of the appellant is to be modified to one under Section 304 Part II (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) of Indian Penal Code by maintaining the conviction for the offence under Section 201 (Causing disappearance of evidence of offence) IPC.
The top court altered the sentence and directed the man to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years, along with a fine of Rs 10,000 imposed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
The bench, however, maintained his conviction for the offence under Section 201 IPC and sentence of three years' rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs 500.
The high court had earlier modified the conviction from Section 302 (murder) IPC to Section 304 Part I read with Section 34 (common intention), IPC, and sentenced him to 12 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10,000.
Joint Accounts, ATM Access: Supreme Court Underlines Homemakers' Rights "No Error": Supreme Court Rejects Review Petitions Against Article 370 Verdict "Can't Sit On A Couch And Say Anything": Top Court Raps Medical Body Chief The 'Fake' CrowdStrike Worker Who Crippled Windows Users Worldwide 500 Para Commandos To Hunt Pakistani Terrorists In Jammu After Attacks Over 300 Indian Students Return As Quota Row Sparks Violence In Bangladesh Woman Dies, Many Feared Trapped After Portion Of Mumbai Building Collapses Study Links Eyelash Extensions To Increased Risk Of Eye Infections Movie Tickets, OTT Subscriptions To Get Costlier As Karnataka Plans 2% Cess Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.