This Article is From Oct 03, 2023

Supreme Court Rejects Request To Declare Ram Sethu A National Monument

'Ram Sethu', also known as Adam's bridge, is a chain of limestone shoals between Pamban Island off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

Advertisement
India News

The petition was filed by an organisation 'Hindu Personal Law Board'.

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a plea seeking directions to declare the 'Ram Sethu' as a national monument and construction of a wall at the site, saying these are administrative matters for the government.

'Ram Sethu', also known as Adam's bridge, is a chain of limestone shoals between Pamban Island off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

The plea came up for hearing before a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia.

The petition was filed by an organisation 'Hindu Personal Law Board' through its president Ashok Pandey.

Pandey, who is also an advocate, informed the bench about a plea filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy which is pending in the apex court.

Advertisement

In his plea, Swamy has sought a direction to the Centre to declare the 'Ram Sethu' as a national heritage monument.

Pandey urged the bench that the plea filed by the board be tagged with Swamy's pending petition.

Advertisement

"If it is pending, it is pending. What do you want?" the bench asked.

When he referred to his prayer for construction of wall at the site, the bench observed, "How can wall be constructed on two sides?" "Is this for the court to do? These are administrative matters for the government. Why should we get into this?" the apex court said.

Advertisement

The bench refused to accede to the petitioner's request that his plea be tagged with the pending petition.

"We are not inclined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution of India to give any nature of direction as the petitioner seeks," the bench said, while refusing to entertain the plea.

Advertisement

Article 32 of the Constitution deals with remedies for enforcement of rights and 32 (1) says that right to move the apex court by appropriate proceedings for enforcement of rights conferred by this part is guaranteed.

The plea filed by the board sought the top court's direction to authorities concerned to construct a wall at the 'Ram Sethu' site.

Advertisement

It also sought a direction for declaring 'Ram Sethu' as a national monument within the provisions of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Featured Video Of The Day

Explained: US Presidential Elections And How The Electoral College Works

Advertisement