After marathon arguments, the Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its orders on pleas challenging the validity of provisions of the IT Act giving powers to arrest those who write offensive posts on social media.
Petitioners - a law student Shreya Singal and other NGOs - had petitioned seeking quashing of Section 66 A of IT act. These petitions were filed after two girls at Palghar in Maharashtra were arrested after they made comments on the protests after the death of Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray in 2012.
The lawyers of the petitioners argued that the definition of provision Section 66 A - grossly menacing, offensive and materials which cause annoyance to public - is vague and it may lead to abuse of the provision. They also argued that even genuine comments criticising a person, caricatures are treated as an offence and people are harassed.
The Centre, justifying the provisions of IT Act, argued that abuse of law is not a ground for quashing it.
The Centre replied that whenever government receives a complaint, a request is made to the service provider to remove material content and the service provider removes the content or disables it. The Centre added that the government has made over 25,000 requests to service providers and there was 79 per cent compliance by the service providers.
"Bad In Law": Top Court Judge On 1981 Reference In Aligarh Muslim University Case "Unemployed": Chief Justice DY Chandrachud's Parting Dig At Trolls Supreme Court Notice To Karnataka On CBI Plea Against Consent Withdrawal For Probe Agency Trump's Immigration Curbs To Impact Millions Of Indians, Their Children Video: Jimmy Kimmel Chokes Up During TV Show Monologue About Trump Win Elon Musk Replies To 'We Need Your Help Removing Trudeau' Post Trump Asks Musk To Join Call With Zelensky In Big Hint At His Possible Role US Judge Pauses Trump 2020 Election Case After His Big Victory Allahbad High Court Declares 2004 "Wedding" Of Minors "Void" Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.