
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Friday decided to examine alleged non-implementation and non-compliance of its guidelines on the issue of strikes and 'dharnas' by political parties and other bodies that may have caused damage to public and private property.
A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the Supreme Court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.
The bench, while granting them eight weeks to respond, also directed them to file status reports on the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.
The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob, who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.
"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Mr Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.
The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states, but they were not given the material.
The PIL submitted said that there were wilful and deliberate omissions on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the Supreme Court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.
The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.
A bench comprising justices P Sathasivam and J S Khehar issued notices to the Centre and all state governments and sought their responses on the allegation that the Supreme Court guidelines issued in this regard in 2007 and 2009 have not been implemented.
The bench, while granting them eight weeks to respond, also directed them to file status reports on the steps they have taken to implement the guidelines issued by the court and to prevent destruction of public and private property during demonstrations and 'hartals'.
The court passed the direction on a PIL filed by advocate Koshy Jacob, who gave instances of such 'bandhs' or 'hartals' declared by political parties in Kerala.
"We will examine this, but the fact remains that you have only highlighted the instances from Kerala," the bench said, asking Mr Jacob's counsel and senior advocate M N Krishnamani to give information regarding such 'bandh' or 'hartal' from other states in the next hearing.
The counsel told the court that they had sought the information under Right to Information Act from other states, but they were not given the material.
The PIL submitted said that there were wilful and deliberate omissions on the parts of the authorities to comply with the April 16, 2009 guidelines passed by the Supreme Court in a matter relating to destruction of public and private properties.
The PIL alleged that if a 'bandh' or 'hartal' was declared by a political party in power, the state government remained mute spectators in disregarding the judgements and guidelines of the apex court, which results in destruction of private and public property in large cases.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world