This Article is From Mar 15, 2024

Supreme Court To Hear Pleas For Stay On Operation Of CAA Rules On March 19

"We will hear this on Tuesday. There are 190 plus cases. All of them will be heard. We will place a full batch with the IAs (Interim applications)," the CJI said.

Advertisement
India News

Supreme Court to hear pleas for stay on operation of CAA Rules on March 19

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear on March 19 the pleas seeking a direction to the Centre to stay the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Rules, 2024 till the top court has decided the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019.

A bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), that once Indian citizenship has been granted to migrant Hindus, it cannot be taken back, and so an early hearing was warranted.

"The CAA was passed in 2019. There were no rules at that time and hence, no stay was granted... Now the government has notified the rules ahead of the Lok Sabha polls. If citizenship is granted, then it will be impossible to reverse. So the interim application may be heard," Sibal said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, questioned the locus standi of the petitioners.

Advertisement

"No petitioner has any locus to question the grant of citizenship," the law officer said, adding there were 237 pending petitions against the CAA and in those four interim applications have been filed seeking a stay on the implementation of the rules.

"We will hear this on Tuesday. There are 190 plus cases. All of them will be heard. We will place a full batch with the IAs (Interim applications)," the CJI said.

Advertisement

IUML, a Kerala based political party, and three other petitioners have filed the interim pleas after the Centre implemented the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 by notifying the rules four years after the contentious law was passed by Parliament to fast-track citizenship for undocumented non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who came to India before December 31, 2014.

The application filed by the IUML has sought the court's direction to ensure no coercive action is taken against people belonging to the Muslim community pending adjudication of the writ petitions.

Advertisement

Muslims cannot apply for Indian citizenship under the CAA.

It has urged the top court to direct the Centre to provisionally permit people belonging to the Muslim community also to apply for citizenship and submit a report on their entitlement.

Advertisement

The Democratic Youth Federation of India has also moved the top court seeking a stay on the rules.

The IUML has urged the court to stay the "continued operation of the impugned provisions of Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019; and Citizenship Amendment Rules 2024, which would result in valuable rights being created and citizenship being granted to persons belonging to only certain religions, thereby resulting in a fait accompli situation, during the pendency of the present writ petition".

Advertisement

Seeking a stay on the rules, the application said about 250 petitions challenging the provisions of the CAA were pending before the top court.

"If in case this court finally decided the CAA as unconstitutional, then these people who would have got citizenship under the impugned Act and rules would have to be deprived of their citizenship or stripped of their citizenship, which would create an anomalous situation," it said.

"Therefore, it is in the best interest of every person to defer the implementation of CAA and impugned rules till this court finally decides the matter," the application said.

It said the Act was passed in 2019 and the government waited for over four years to notify the rules.

"The government did not consider it as urgent to implement it for the past 4.5 years. Therefore, to wait till the final decision of this court would not affect anybody's rights or interest," the application said.

It said the IUML had in its petition itself stated that it was not against giving citizenship to migrants.

"However, its position is that this is a legislation which is based on the exclusion of a religion. Since the CAA discriminates on the basis of religion, it strikes at the root of the concept of secularism, which is the basic structure of the Constitution," it said.

With the unveiling of the rules on March 11, days ahead of the announcement of the Lok Sabha elections, the Modi government kicked off the process of granting Indian citizenship to persecuted non-Muslim migrants -- Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis and Christians -- from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh.

The rules came into force with immediate effect, according to a gazette notification.

The contentious CAA had sparked protests in various parts of the country in late 2019 and early 2020 over alleged discriminatory provisions.

While refusing to stay the operation of the law, the top court had on December 18, 2019 issued notices to the Centre on the pleas.
 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Featured Video Of The Day

Remembering Icon Shashi Ruia

Advertisement