The Triple Talaq" bill has been passed by the Lok Sabha. The government considered a law on it after the Supreme Court said in August last year that the traditional method of Muslim men instantly divorcing their wives by uttering "Talaq" thrice was "unconstitutional" and "arbitrary". Opposition parties, led by the Congress, are against criminalizing the act, arguing that it does not applies only to Islam and not to any other religion. "We agree that the bill is for women, but we have our objections to this bill. We do not agree in making instant triple talaq a criminal act. This government has made repeated attempts to misuse the Supreme Court's judgement," Congress' Sushmita Dey said.
During the debate,Union minister Smriti Irani said if a contract is being cancelled, it cannot be done unilaterally. And if it is cancelled, there are repercussions.
The proposed law suggests a three-year jail term for erring husbands. The revised bill was drafted after the first draft got stalled in Rajya Sabha in January and the opposition members suggested changes.
The BJP and the Congress have issued whips to their members in the Lok Sabha asking them to be present during the discussion.
Here are the highlights on the Triple Talaq Bill in Lok Sabha
M Kharge, Congress on #TripleTalaq Bill passed in LS: Bill presented is against Constitution,it's against fundamental rights. We asked for the Bill to be sent to Joint Select Committee to get justice for Muslim women.They tried to get it passed as Lok Sabha polls are approaching. pic.twitter.com/MFlNZNj1Cl
- ANI (@ANI) December 27, 2018
Anwar Raja, AIADMK MP on #TripleTalaqBill: The Bill is against the Muslim community. Our party will oppose the Bill, we are against it, that is our stand. pic.twitter.com/ft9d9SMV48
- ANI (@ANI) December 27, 2018
- We do not agree in making instant triple talaq a criminal act. This government has made repeated attempts to misuse the Supreme Court's judgement.
- We all know that in Islam, a marriage is a contract. And for the breach of any contract in this country, the procedure is strictly under civil law.
- By this law, in fact, it gives the option of trying the man under this, instead of the domestic abuse law, which is more stringent.
- We oppose this bill, as all this does is that it penalizes Muslim men for a civil offence.
- You must see the bill which was introduced by Rajiv Gandhi, which was based on the Shah Bano case. Take a leaf from that legislation.
- With this bill, all the woman is getting is a criminal case which she can file in court, and nothing else. We want you (law minister) to define substance.
- Tell me one thing, If a woman is deserted by her husband in any other religion, do we make it a criminal proceeding? No. We file a civil case.
- This bill is not about justice for women, it instead is targeting men.