Mumbai: Twelve years after he was arrested on the charges of robbery, a hawker has been acquitted by the Bombay High Court pointing out that the trial court erred in relying only on the recovery of gold, that too in melted form, to convict him.
Justice VM Kanade heard the appeal, filed in 2001 by Harish Yadav (23), challenging the trial court's order, convicting him under Section 392 (robbery). Yadav was sentenced to five-year rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs 5,000.
Prosecution said, on March 31, 1998 four people entered Rajashree Jewellers, owned by Sunil Kumar Fattelalji Jain, and took gold jewellery after assaulting him with a chopper. Yadav was arrested and the stolen gold was recovered at his instance from Varanasi. The goldsmith's statement was recorded and six witnesses were examined. Yadav was convicted.
Amicus curie Nihar Garg submitted that no identification parade was held by the police and neither Jain nor the goldsmith had identified Yadav. He submitted that the goldsmith identified Yadav only in court.
Garg argued that the gold recovered at his instance was in melted form and not in the form of ornaments and, as such, there was no material to show that this was the gold which was stolen from the jewellery shop.
Additional public prosecutor VR Bhosale submitted that the recovery of the ornaments was one of the circumstances on which the reliance was placed by the trial court and therefore there was no reason to set aside the finding.
Copyright restricted. Under license from www.3dsyndication.com
Justice VM Kanade heard the appeal, filed in 2001 by Harish Yadav (23), challenging the trial court's order, convicting him under Section 392 (robbery). Yadav was sentenced to five-year rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs 5,000.
Prosecution said, on March 31, 1998 four people entered Rajashree Jewellers, owned by Sunil Kumar Fattelalji Jain, and took gold jewellery after assaulting him with a chopper. Yadav was arrested and the stolen gold was recovered at his instance from Varanasi. The goldsmith's statement was recorded and six witnesses were examined. Yadav was convicted.
Garg argued that the gold recovered at his instance was in melted form and not in the form of ornaments and, as such, there was no material to show that this was the gold which was stolen from the jewellery shop.
Advertisement
Copyright restricted. Under license from www.3dsyndication.com
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Dawood Declared Terrorist In Individual Capacity, Says Bombay High Court; Grants Bail To Two UAPA Accused 10 Additional Delhi, Bombay High Court Judges Made Permanent 12-Year-Old Girl Among 3 Drown At Quarry Pit In Telangana: Cops Woman On Scooter With 2 Kids Punched, Left Bleeding In Pune Road Rage Case After Retest, Haryana NEET Centre With Most Top Scorers Gave This Result... What Recovery Of Austrian Gun 'Steyr AUG' From J&K Terrorists Means "Fully Focused On Ensuring Safety Of Indians In Bangladesh": S Jaishankar Goods Train Derails in UP's Amroha, 15 Trains Cancelled Or Diverted BJP Will Protect Tribal Lands If Voted To Power: Amit Shah In Jharkhand Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.