New Delhi: Several dance bar and hotel owners in Mumbai today moved the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the government's new law alleging that it results in banning of dance performances by artistes.
The petition claimed that the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016 violates the fundamental rights of hotel and bar owners and sought the court's direction to declare it unconstitutional, invalid, void and unenforceable.
"The result of the impugned Act and Rules made thereunder is that under the garb of regulation it literally results in banning of performance of dance of any kind or type in an eating house, permit room or beer bar. The ban has been held to be unconstitutional by both the high court and this court vide its judgment...," said the plea filed by Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (AHAR).
It also said members of the petitioner association have all the requisite permissions and licences for running bars and restaurants and comply with the conditions for running such establishments including conditions for serving alcohol.
The plea said the artistes performing in places of public entertainment are qualified and talented and are entitled to practice their profession which is their fundamental right.
"Apart from the same constituting the fundamental rights of artistes, it is also fundamental right of the petitioner's members to carry on their trade and business subject to permissible and reasonable regulations.
"However, the effect of the impugned Act and Rules will lead to a total prohibition and the same will constitute a violation of their fundamental rights to carry on any business, trade and profession of their choice...," it said.
The petition claimed that the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016 violates the fundamental rights of hotel and bar owners and sought the court's direction to declare it unconstitutional, invalid, void and unenforceable.
"The result of the impugned Act and Rules made thereunder is that under the garb of regulation it literally results in banning of performance of dance of any kind or type in an eating house, permit room or beer bar. The ban has been held to be unconstitutional by both the high court and this court vide its judgment...," said the plea filed by Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (AHAR).
The plea said the artistes performing in places of public entertainment are qualified and talented and are entitled to practice their profession which is their fundamental right.
Advertisement
"However, the effect of the impugned Act and Rules will lead to a total prohibition and the same will constitute a violation of their fundamental rights to carry on any business, trade and profession of their choice...," it said.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Supreme Court To Hear Petitions Relating To NEET-UG Controversy Tomorrow Delhi Government Must Take Blame For Permission To Fell 422 Trees: Supreme Court Biden Weighing Proposals To Reform US Supreme Court? Details Inside Amid Huge Row, Karnataka Pauses Bill For Reservation In Private Sector Firms Travel Influencer Aanvi Kamdar Dies After Falling Off A Waterfall Near Mumbai UP Banker Dies By Suicide After 6 Months Of Bullying, Body-Shaming Major Crackdown Launched On Terror Network In J&K After Doda Encounter UK's New Government Vows To Remove 92 Unelected Peers From Upper House EU's Carbon Tax Could Cost India 0.05% Of GDP: Report Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.