Bad things don't happen to good banks. Or that's the carefully crafted image projected by the world's priciest lender.
Assiduously shielding its loan book from the flying debris of India's $207 billion bad-debt crisis, HDFC Bank Ltd. has kept its balance sheet in a near-pristine condition. The aura of invincibility bestowed by a 1.26 percent soured-loan ratio -- compared with almost 10 percent for State Bank of India and 25 percent for IDBI Bank Ltd. -- also explains why HDFC Bank has a price-to-book multiple of 5.2. Among lenders with at least $50 billion in market value, anywhere, none is as expensive.
So it was a surprise last month when HDFC Bank reported a hefty provision against an unnamed corporate account that it said wasn't a nonperforming asset, then one day later marked the loan down to NPA because the Reserve Bank of India, the regulator, had told it to do so.
This opens a Pandora's Box. Jindal Steel had net debt of 440 billion rupees ($6.8 billion) at the end of September. Was the steel company indeed the unidentified shaky account? If so, was HDFC Bank on the hook to that borrower for more than 15 percent of its reported nonperforming assets on March 31, the end of its financial year? Hazari believes so.
In that case, the correct thing to do would be for HDFC Bank to acknowledge the "divergence" between its self-reported and RBI-assessed NPAs. But doing so would also mean admitting that those soured loans, net of provisions, were 95 percent more than disclosed in the full-year accounts.
Its halo would thus slip, and the charge of being less than truthful that I've leveled at other non-state Indian lenders -- Axis Bank Ltd., ICICI Bank Ltd. and Yes Bank Ltd. -- would apply equally to HDFC Bank.
Questions might also arise about the RBI. Axis Bank CEO Shikha Sharma told the Economic Times that she was compelled by the central bank to reclassify standard borrowers as NPAs, and did so because "we are obedient children." Jindal Steel has been named by local media as one of those accounts. The RBI can't arbitrarily force some lenders to appear less than truthful, while sparing others the humiliation of a mea culpa.
The fairness of the RBI's assessment is one thing, its correctness is another. For now, India's bloated steelmakers are enjoying an uptick in domestic demand and operating profitability. But they aren't out of the woods.
Suppose sometime after March next year, Jindal Steel struggled to pay rentals on its expensive sale-and-leaseback deal with Srei Equipment Finance Ltd., and the latter dragged it to the insolvency tribunal. By then the firm would have been an NPA for a year, and India recently prohibited borrowers with nonperforming loans overdue a year or longer -- or parties connected to such debtors -- from bidding for assets in bankruptcy.
Not only would Naveen Jindal, chairman of Jindal Steel, stand to forfeit the firm; even his brother Sajjan Jindal's JSW Energy Ltd., which is already bailing out the sibling's company by buying one of its power plants, would be unable to help him win it back because it's a connected party.
With the stakes this high, the RBI needs to crack the whip of asset classification with a steady hand -- one that treats creditors fairly and borrowers correctly. Meanwhile, HDFC Bank must present a more accurate picture of its soured loans. After all, bad things can happen even to great banks.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist covering industrial companies and financial services. He previously was a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He has also worked for the Straits Times, ET NOW and Bloomberg News.
To contact the author of this story: Andy Mukherjee in Hong Kong at amukherjee@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Sillitoe at psillitoe@bloomberg.net
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of NDTV and NDTV does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Assiduously shielding its loan book from the flying debris of India's $207 billion bad-debt crisis, HDFC Bank Ltd. has kept its balance sheet in a near-pristine condition. The aura of invincibility bestowed by a 1.26 percent soured-loan ratio -- compared with almost 10 percent for State Bank of India and 25 percent for IDBI Bank Ltd. -- also explains why HDFC Bank has a price-to-book multiple of 5.2. Among lenders with at least $50 billion in market value, anywhere, none is as expensive.
This opens a Pandora's Box. Jindal Steel had net debt of 440 billion rupees ($6.8 billion) at the end of September. Was the steel company indeed the unidentified shaky account? If so, was HDFC Bank on the hook to that borrower for more than 15 percent of its reported nonperforming assets on March 31, the end of its financial year? Hazari believes so.
In that case, the correct thing to do would be for HDFC Bank to acknowledge the "divergence" between its self-reported and RBI-assessed NPAs. But doing so would also mean admitting that those soured loans, net of provisions, were 95 percent more than disclosed in the full-year accounts.
Advertisement
Questions might also arise about the RBI. Axis Bank CEO Shikha Sharma told the Economic Times that she was compelled by the central bank to reclassify standard borrowers as NPAs, and did so because "we are obedient children." Jindal Steel has been named by local media as one of those accounts. The RBI can't arbitrarily force some lenders to appear less than truthful, while sparing others the humiliation of a mea culpa.
The fairness of the RBI's assessment is one thing, its correctness is another. For now, India's bloated steelmakers are enjoying an uptick in domestic demand and operating profitability. But they aren't out of the woods.
Advertisement
Not only would Naveen Jindal, chairman of Jindal Steel, stand to forfeit the firm; even his brother Sajjan Jindal's JSW Energy Ltd., which is already bailing out the sibling's company by buying one of its power plants, would be unable to help him win it back because it's a connected party.
With the stakes this high, the RBI needs to crack the whip of asset classification with a steady hand -- one that treats creditors fairly and borrowers correctly. Meanwhile, HDFC Bank must present a more accurate picture of its soured loans. After all, bad things can happen even to great banks.
Advertisement
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist covering industrial companies and financial services. He previously was a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He has also worked for the Straits Times, ET NOW and Bloomberg News.
Advertisement
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of NDTV and NDTV does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Banking Sector Witnessing A Decade-High Performance: RBI Number Of New Jobs More Than Doubles To 46.6 Million In 2023-24: RBI Data India To Create A Cross-Border Retail Payment Platform With 4 ASEAN Countries Massive Worldwide Microsoft Outage: Flights, Markets, Stock Exchange Down CrowdStrike Falcon Sensor: The Culprit Behind World's Biggest IT Outage In 1st Statement After Outage, CrowdStrike CEO Says... Why Some People Are Happy When They Are Dying Triptii Dimri's Sheer White Dress Only Gave Good News To Fashion Fans "Attack On Constitution": Priyanka Gandhi Hits Out At Kanwar Yatra Order Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.