Chennai: After 18 years of legal battle, a court in Bangalore is expected to give its verdict in the disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa on September 20.
The verdict is crucial as it could determine her continuation in office. This is in line with a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court last year which ruled that lawmakers sentenced to more than two years in jail should be disqualified, even if they have appealed to a higher court.
"The prosecution is hopeful of conviction," said Murugesh S Mardi, Assistant Advocate to the Special Public Prosecutor.
Asked what kind of political change the verdict could bring about, DMK Chief M Karunanidhi said on Thursday, "This would definitely bring about a change of heart."
The case pertains to Ms Jayalalithaa's first tenure as Chief Minister between 1991 and 1996 when she allegedly accrued assets worth Rs. 66 crore, vastly disproportionate to her declared sources of income.
The court has directed the 66-year-old AIADMK chief and three other accused - her close aide Sasikala, disowned foster son Sudhakaran and Sasikala's sister-in-law Ilavarasi - to be present in court.
In 2003, the case was moved from Chennai to Bangalore on the orders of the Supreme Court after the DMK alleged the trial wouldn't be fair in Tamil Nadu which was at the time governed by Jayalalithaa.
Recently, the chief minister has been unsuccessful in staving off another case which seeks to punish her for failing income tax returns in the early 90s. The Supreme Court has refused to order that the case be dropped. It is being heard by a court in Chennai.
The verdict is crucial as it could determine her continuation in office. This is in line with a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court last year which ruled that lawmakers sentenced to more than two years in jail should be disqualified, even if they have appealed to a higher court.
"The prosecution is hopeful of conviction," said Murugesh S Mardi, Assistant Advocate to the Special Public Prosecutor.
The case pertains to Ms Jayalalithaa's first tenure as Chief Minister between 1991 and 1996 when she allegedly accrued assets worth Rs. 66 crore, vastly disproportionate to her declared sources of income.
Advertisement
In 2003, the case was moved from Chennai to Bangalore on the orders of the Supreme Court after the DMK alleged the trial wouldn't be fair in Tamil Nadu which was at the time governed by Jayalalithaa.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Bad News For Shreyas Iyer: BCCI Officials Say "No Room, Won't Go To..." India, US To Explore Strengthening Energy Cooperation How India Is Aiding Typhoon-Hit Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam; Drought-Hit Namibia 9 Dead, 2,800 Hurt As Pagers Explode Across Lebanon, Hezbollah Blames Israel "Wear Proper Undergarments": Delta Airlines' New Memo For Flight Attendants IndiGo Flight Tailstrike Leaves Huge Dent During Take-Off From Delhi Airport Mohana Singh Becomes First Woman Fighter Pilot In LCA Tejas Fighter Fleet How Google Search Reunited Two Senior Citizens With Their Families Russian Group Behind Fake Kamala Harris Hit-And-Run Story: Microsoft Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.