New Delhi: In a relief to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, the Supreme Court today quashed the withdrawal of Special Public Prosecutor Bhavani Singh in a disproportionate assets case against her.
The apex court also asked the Karnataka high court to consider giving, in consultation with the state government, an extension to the presiding judge in the case, who retires today, upon his superannuation.
The apex court bench headed by Justice BS Chauhan said, "We recommend that the Karnataka High Court in consultation with Karnataka state government consider extending the superannuation of Judge Balakrishna", given the peculiar circumstances and voluminous evidence in the case.
Ms Jayalalithaa and two other co-accused in the case had contended that when the trial in the 18-year old case was nearing conclusion, the Congress government in Karnataka, at the behest of her political rivals in Tamil Nadu politics, withdrew Special Public Prosecutor Bhavani Singh from the case when he was in the third day of his final arguments.
The Tamil Nadu chief minister said that the new public prosecutor and the trial court judge would take time to familiarize themselves with the case. The evidence alone in the case runs into 34,000 pages.
DMK general secretary K Anbazhagan had moved the Karnataka High Court, seeking the removal of Mr Singh. Though he was brought back after Ms Jayalaithaa moved the apex court, challenging the procedure of his removal, he was again withdrawn from the case after consultation with the chief justice of the Karnataka High Court, as was provided for in the earlier order of the apex court.
The apex court also asked the Karnataka high court to consider giving, in consultation with the state government, an extension to the presiding judge in the case, who retires today, upon his superannuation.
The apex court bench headed by Justice BS Chauhan said, "We recommend that the Karnataka High Court in consultation with Karnataka state government consider extending the superannuation of Judge Balakrishna", given the peculiar circumstances and voluminous evidence in the case.
The Tamil Nadu chief minister said that the new public prosecutor and the trial court judge would take time to familiarize themselves with the case. The evidence alone in the case runs into 34,000 pages.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Supreme Court Relief To 30 Army Men In 2021 Botched Nagaland Operation "Bulldozer Can't Be Justice": Akhilesh Yadav On Supreme Court Halting Demolitions "Matter Of Decorum": Supreme Court On Plea Seek Summer Exemption From Black Coat 9 Dead, 2,800 Hurt As Pagers Explode Across Lebanon, Hezbollah Blames Israel China, Russia Concerned About India-US Relationship: Top American Diplomat 'Pager Bombs' Target Hezbollah In Lebanon. What We Know So Far - 5 Points UN Says Lebanon Pager Blasts 'Extremely Concerning Escalation' Kamala Harris Calls For End To War In Gaza, No Israeli Reoccupation Kamala Harris Dials Trump After Apparent Assassination Attempt Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.