Madurai: The Madras High Court in Madurai has held that a wedding between minor girl and boy will not become void automatically without either of them obtaining a decree of divorce from family court within two years of their attaining the legal age for marriage.
A division bench in Madurai comprising justices S Manikumar and CT Selvam gave the ruling while setting aside the order of a lower court in Tirunelveli in April last refusing to take on file a woman's divorce petition on the ground that she was a minor while getting married in 1995 and hence the wedding had automatically become void then itself.
The bench said that though the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, prescribed a minimum age for marriage, the breach of the Act would render the marriage void under Section 11 or Section 12.
However, section 13 of the act, which lists out grounds for divorce, states that every child marriage shall be voidable at the option of the contracting party, provided that such marriage, whether consummated or not, was repudiated within two years of either of them attaining the marriage age -- 18 for women and 21 for men.
This anomaly was taken note of by a full bench of the high court, which had expressed hope that Parliament would carry out necessary amendments to avoid complications, the division bench noted.
It was apparent that the Tirunelveli court was under the mistaken impression of a marriage involving a child being void.
Hence, it directed the Family Court in Tirunelveli to number the divorce petition and proceed in accordance with law.
A division bench in Madurai comprising justices S Manikumar and CT Selvam gave the ruling while setting aside the order of a lower court in Tirunelveli in April last refusing to take on file a woman's divorce petition on the ground that she was a minor while getting married in 1995 and hence the wedding had automatically become void then itself.
The bench said that though the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, prescribed a minimum age for marriage, the breach of the Act would render the marriage void under Section 11 or Section 12.
This anomaly was taken note of by a full bench of the high court, which had expressed hope that Parliament would carry out necessary amendments to avoid complications, the division bench noted.
Advertisement
Hence, it directed the Family Court in Tirunelveli to number the divorce petition and proceed in accordance with law.
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Prosecuting People Will Not Resolve Issue Of Child Marriage: Supreme Court Mayawati Aide, Hacked To Death, Cannot Be Buried In BSP Office: Court "Hooch Victims Not Freedom Fighters": Plea Opposes Rs 10 Lakh Compensation Travel Influencer Aanvi Kamdar Dies After Falling Off A Waterfall Near Mumbai Amid Huge Row, Karnataka Pauses Bill For Reservation In Private Sector Firms BJP Subtly Asking Ajit Pawar To Quit "Mahayuti": Sharad Pawar's NCP Biden Says Could Drop Election Bid If "Medical Condition" Emerged Russia Says It's Ready To Work With Any US Leader 3 People Die After Drowning In Lake In Telangana: Cops Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.