The Madras High Court today initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against two advocates and a litigant on a letter in which they had cast "contemptuous aspersions" against some judges of the court.
Rejecting apologies tendered by advocates Jai Shankar and S Patabhiram, a Larger Bench comprising seven judges directed the court registry to number the suo motu contempt petition and issue notice to the lawyers and A Vimala and post the matter for hearing on March 8 and ordered the three to be present in the court on that day.
The bench in its order said the letter "in dictatory terms said that about 13 judges, right from the Chief Justice and senior most judges should not hear their matter".
The contemnors had also cast some aspersions on a division bench of the court comprising justices K N Basha and Paul N Vasanthakumar by stating that the judges should not hear a case filed by them.
The bench comprising Chief Justice M Y Eqbal and justices Elipe Dharma Rao, D Murugesan, C Nagappan, R Banumathi, K Mohan Ram and P Jothimani will take up the question as to whether 'unfounded and irresponsible' the allegations of the advocates and clients against judges of the high court and complaints to the Chief Justice that he or she had lost faith in a particular judge would amount to criminal contempt.
The order said the need for constitution of the Larger Bench had arisen because of the continuous complaints received by the Chief Justice from a few advocates and allegations and aspersions maligning judges.
Rejecting apologies tendered by advocates Jai Shankar and S Patabhiram, a Larger Bench comprising seven judges directed the court registry to number the suo motu contempt petition and issue notice to the lawyers and A Vimala and post the matter for hearing on March 8 and ordered the three to be present in the court on that day.
The bench in its order said the letter "in dictatory terms said that about 13 judges, right from the Chief Justice and senior most judges should not hear their matter".
The bench comprising Chief Justice M Y Eqbal and justices Elipe Dharma Rao, D Murugesan, C Nagappan, R Banumathi, K Mohan Ram and P Jothimani will take up the question as to whether 'unfounded and irresponsible' the allegations of the advocates and clients against judges of the high court and complaints to the Chief Justice that he or she had lost faith in a particular judge would amount to criminal contempt.
Advertisement
Advertisement
COMMENTS
Advertisement
"Unforgettable Experience": Arshdeep Singh Calls T20 World Cup Final "Favourite" Match Rishabh Pant May Leave Delhi Capitals. This IPL Team Leads Race To Sign Him: Report 10 Additional Delhi, Bombay High Court Judges Made Permanent The 'Fake' CrowdStrike Worker Who Crippled Windows Users Worldwide 500 Para Commandos To Hunt Pakistani Terrorists In Jammu After Attacks Over 300 Indian Students Return As Quota Row Sparks Violence In Bangladesh On Sonu Sood's Post About Kanwar Yatra Order, Kangana Ranaut's Rejoinder Salma Hayek Is A Garden Full Of Daisies Summed In A Dress Dutch Content Creator Finds Hotel Room For $1.4 In Pak, Internet Reacts Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.