Madras High Court today dismissed the pleas to trace two AIADMK MLAs who were allegedly under "illegal" detention at a resort, where legislators supporting VK Sasikala have been staying. "We do not find any merit," said the court which declined to entertain a suggestion to appoint an amicus curie, or advisor to the court, to personally go and inspect the resort in Koovathur on the outskirts of Chennai.
The division bench comprising justices M Jaichandren and T Mathivanan dismissed the two habeas corpus petitions seeking that legislators Geetha and RT Ramachandran of Krishnarayapuram and Kunnam constituencies respectively be traced and set free.
"Having taken into consideration the relevant facts, we find that since the question of maintainability is hanging over the petition, we do not find any merit," the bench said.
Referring to the Bar Council of India rules, it said, "Rule 9 contemplated that an advocate should not act or plead in any manner in which he himself is peculiarly interested and the Rule 18 mandated that an advocate shall not act at any time be a party to fomented litigants.
"Keeping in view of the fact, we are of the considered view that the petitions are devoid of any merit and is therefore deserved to be dismissed."
The HCPs filed on February 9 alleged illegal detention of 130-odd ruling AIADMK MLAs after the Tamil Nadu government said the legislators were staying at the MLAs' Hostel and were "free to move around".
Earlier, the court had sought the state government's response to allegations that AIADMK MLAs were being illegally detained in the resort and had reserved its orders.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
The division bench comprising justices M Jaichandren and T Mathivanan dismissed the two habeas corpus petitions seeking that legislators Geetha and RT Ramachandran of Krishnarayapuram and Kunnam constituencies respectively be traced and set free.
Referring to the Bar Council of India rules, it said, "Rule 9 contemplated that an advocate should not act or plead in any manner in which he himself is peculiarly interested and the Rule 18 mandated that an advocate shall not act at any time be a party to fomented litigants.
Advertisement
The HCPs filed on February 9 alleged illegal detention of 130-odd ruling AIADMK MLAs after the Tamil Nadu government said the legislators were staying at the MLAs' Hostel and were "free to move around".
Advertisement
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
COMMENTS
Advertisement
AIADMK Leaders Walk Out Of Tamil Nadu Assembly Over Toxic Liquor Deaths "Time Is Ripe, My Re-Entry Into AIADMK Has Begun," VK Sasikala Declares AIADMK To Boycott Assembly Bypoll For This Key Seat 'Match', Date Night And A Huge Bill: Modus Operandi In Dating App Scams In PM's Call With Team India, Special Thanks For Rahul Dravid Woman Beaten Up In Bengal Town 'Street Justice', Mamata Banerjee Draws Fire 5 Lankan Fishermen Consume Contents Found In Bottle Floating In Sea, Die 5 Of Family Drown In Waterfall Near Bhusi Dam In Maharashtra's Lonavala Delhi To Give Rs 10 Lakh Aid To Families Of Those Who Drowned Due To Rain Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.